ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2022
Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current status of diabetes treatment in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey conducted in 2016 and 2020.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionThe Japanese diabetes treatment guidelines do not specify the first choice of hypoglycemic agents, unlike those of Western countries. Furthermore, the current situation in diabetes treatment is that the choice of hypoglycemic agents is determined by each physician. Therefore, we aimed to determine the current situation in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in this context. For this, we carried out a questionnaire survey among physicians twice regarding the target value of glycated hemoglobin and the choice of hypoglycemic agents in various cases. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe administered an unsigned questionnaire to physicians in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in July 2016 and March 2020. We divided responses into those of diabetologists and those of non-diabetologists, and analyzed each response. We then compared the results between both years.
resultsIn total, 18 diabetologists and 142 non-diabetologists responded in 2016, and 21 diabetologists and 134 non-diabetologists responded in 2020. Many diabetologists chose biguanide as the first-line drug for obese type 2 diabetes patients. In addition, the rate of choice of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) among physicians almost increased in 2020. Some non-diabetologists, and even a few diabetologists, inappropriately chose SGLT2i and biguanide for patients with severe renal dysfunction.
conclusionsBecause SGLT2i became available in 2016 and a few years have passed, both diabetologists and non-diabetologists seemed to refrain from prescribing SGLT2i. However, with the emergence of various lines of firm evidence regarding the use of SGLT2i, physicians started to prescribe it. However, some diabetologists and non-diabetologists chose hypoglycemic agents inadequately; therefore, there is a need for novel and precise information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.