ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2022
Large Chaperone Complexes Through the Lens of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-sedimentation is the key to the structural investigation of wild-type FAT10.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2026Article
- Expression and role of HSPA5 in environmental toxin-induced neurological disorders.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
- A low-complexity linker as a driver of intra- and intermolecular interactions in DNAJB chaperones.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Maintaining the Integral Membrane Proteome: Revisiting the Functional Repertoire of Integral Membrane Proteases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Review
- Decoding chaperone complexes: Insights from NMR spectroscopy.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Insights into protein structure using cryogenic light microscopy.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023Review
- Intrinsic structural dynamics dictate enzymatic activity and inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Quantitative NMR analysis of the mechanism and kinetics of chaperone Hsp104 action on amyloid-β42 aggregation and fibril formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Chasing long-range evolutionary couplings in the AlphaFold era.Biopolymers · 2023Article
- NMR spectroscopy, excited states and relevance to problems in cell biology - transient pre-nucleation tetramerization of huntingtin and insights into Huntington's disease.Journal of cell science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular chaperones are the guardians of the proteome inside the cell. Chaperones recognize and bind unfolded or misfolded substrates, thereby preventing further aggregation; promoting correct protein folding; and, in some instances, even disaggregating already formed aggregates. Chaperones perform their function by means of an array of weak protein-protein interactions that take place over a wide range of timescales and are therefore invisible to structural techniques dependent upon the availability of highly homogeneous samples. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, however, is ideally suited to study dynamic, rapidly interconverting conformational states and protein-protein interactions in solution, even if these involve a high-molecular-weight component. In this review, we give a brief overview of the principles used by chaperones to bind their client proteins and describe NMR methods that have emerged as valuable tools to probe chaperone-substrate and chaperone-chaperone interactions. We then focus on a few systems for which the application of these methods has greatly increased our understanding of the mechanisms underlying chaperone functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.