Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35046492›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Label-free imaging flow cytometry for analysis and sorting of enzymatically dissociated tissues.

Maik Herbig, Karen Tessmer, Martin Nötzel, Ahsan Ahmad Nawaz, Tiago Santos-Ferreira, Oliver Borsch, Sylvia J Gasparini, Jochen Guck, Marius Ader

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-Cell Protein Assays in Context: From 2D to 3D and In Situ Analysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Optical sorting: past, present and future.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Sorting differentiated mammalian cells using deterministic lateral displacement microfluidic devices.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maik Herbig *Biotechnology Center, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Karen Tessmer *Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin NötzelBiotechnology Center, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ahsan Ahmad NawazMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light & Max-Planck-Zentrum Für Physik Und Medizin, Erlangen, Germany.
Tiago Santos-FerreiraCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Oliver BorschCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sylvia J GaspariniCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jochen GuckMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light & Max-Planck-Zentrum Für Physik Und Medizin, Erlangen, Germany.
Marius AderCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. marius.ader@tu-dresden.de.
TU Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light · DERoche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 399422891SPP2127 Program AD375/7-1SPP2127 Program GU612/5-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research relies on identification and isolation of specific cell types using molecular biomarkers and sorting methods such as fluorescence or magnetic activated cell sorting. Labelling processes potentially alter the cells' properties and should be avoided, especially when purifying cells for clinical applications. A promising alternative is the label-free identification of cells based on physical properties. Sorting real-time deformability cytometry (soRT-DC) is a microfluidic technique for label-free analysis and sorting of single cells. In soRT-FDC, bright-field images of cells are analyzed by a deep neural net (DNN) to obtain a sorting decision, but sorting was so far only demonstrated for blood cells which show clear morphological differences and are naturally in suspension. Most cells, however, grow in tissues, requiring dissociation before cell sorting which is associated with challenges including changes in morphology, or presence of aggregates. Here, we introduce methods to improve robustness of analysis and sorting of single cells from nervous tissue and provide DNNs which can distinguish visually similar cells. We employ the DNN for image-based sorting to enrich photoreceptor cells from dissociated retina for transplantation into the mouse eye.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAnimalsCell AggregationFlow CytometryMicePhotoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate

Identifiers

PMID35046492
PMCPMC8770577
OpenAlexW4205726890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.