Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047433›Full record

ReviewPreventive nutrition and food science2021

Dietary Intake in Relation to the Risk of Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.

Neda Heidarzadeh-Esfahani, Davood Soleimani, Salimeh Hajiahmadi, Shima Moradi, Nafiseh Heidarzadeh, Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive nutrition and food science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. GERD: Latest update on acid-suppressant drugs.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neda Heidarzadeh-EsfahaniStudent Research Committee, School of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6719851552, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2930
Davood SoleimaniResearch Center of Oils and Fats, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6719851552, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-3743
Salimeh HajiahmadiDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 8916188635, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-1258
Shima MoradiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6719851552, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-7928
Nafiseh HeidarzadehDepertment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord 881863414, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-9176
Seyyed Mostafa NachvakDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6719851552, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7265-3495
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRShahrekord University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition which has a high global prevalence. Dietary intake is considered to be a contributing factor for GERD. However, scientific evidence about the effect of diet on the risk of GERD is controversial. This systematic review was conducted to address this issue. A comprehensive structured search was performed using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to August 2020, in accordance with the PRISMA statement. No restrictions were set in terms of language, time of publication, or study location. Study selection and data abstraction was conducted independently by two authors, and risk of bias was assessed using a modified Quality in Prognosis Studies Tool. Eligible studies evaluating the impact of food and dietary pattern on GERD were included in qualitative data synthesis. After excluding duplicate, irrelevant, and low quality studies, 25 studies were identified for inclusion: 5 case-control studies, 14 cross-sectional studies, and 6 prospective studies. This review indicates that high-fat diets, carbonated beverages, citrus products, and spicy, salty, and fried foods are associated with risk of GERD.

Indexed as

dietfoodgastroesophageal refluxsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35047433
PMCPMC8747955
OpenAlexW4206581022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.