Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047836›Full record

ArticleHGG advances2021

Integrative approaches generate insights into the architecture of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

Julia Welzenbach, Nigel L Hammond, Miloš Nikolić, Frederic Thieme, Nina Ishorst, Elizabeth J Leslie, Seth M Weinberg, Terri H Beaty, Mary L Marazita, Elisabeth Mangold and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HGG advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Functional analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Julia WelzenbachInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nigel L HammondFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Miloš NikolićCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Frederic ThiemeInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nina IshorstInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Elizabeth J LeslieDepartment of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Seth M WeinbergCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Terri H BeatyDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mary L MarazitaCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elisabeth MangoldInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Michael KnappInstitute of Medical Biometry, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Justin CotneyDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Alvaro Rada-IglesiasCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael J DixonFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Kerstin U LudwigInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

Genetics of Craniofacial Disorders and Related PhenotypesR00DE025060 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LESLIE-CLARKSON, ELIZABETH JANE · 2017 to 2019
$732k
Sequence-based discovery of risk and modifier variants for orofacial cleftsR03DE027103 · NIDCR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LESLIE-CLARKSON, ELIZABETH JANE · 2018 to 2019
$312k
NIDCR NIH HHS R00 DE025060NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE027103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P) is a common congenital facial malformation with a multifactorial etiology. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified multiple genetic risk loci. However, functional interpretation of these loci is hampered by the underrepresentation in public resources of systematic functional maps representative of human embryonic facial development. To generate novel insights into the etiology of nsCL/P, we leveraged published GWAS data on nsCL/P as well as available chromatin modification and expression data on mid-facial development. Our analyses identified five novel risk loci, prioritized candidate target genes within associated regions, and highlighted distinct pathways. Furthermore, the results suggest the presence of distinct regulatory effects of nsCL/P risk variants throughout mid-facial development and shed light on its regulatory architecture. Our integrated data provide a platform to advance hypothesis-driven molecular investigations of nsCL/P and other human facial defects.

Indexed as

chromatin markcleftcraniofacial developmentGWASregulatory effects

Identifiers

PMID35047836
PMCPMC8756534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.