ArticleHuman genetics2022
Fine human genetic map based on UK10K data set.
Article in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Insights Into Species Divergence and Adaptive Evolution in the Grass GenusEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Population genomics reveals population structure, glacial divergence, and intertidal adaptation in the Chinese chiton (Liolophura sinensis).Communications biology · 2026Article
- Exploration of Genome-Wide Recombination Rate Variation Patterns at Different Scales in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination is a major force that shapes genetic diversity. Determination of recombination rate is important and can theoretically be improved by increasing the sample size. However, it is nearly impossible to estimate recombination rates using traditional population genetics methods when the sample size is large because these methods are highly computationally demanding. In this study, we used a refined machine learning approach to estimate the recombination rate of the human genome using the UK10K human genomic dataset with 7,562 genomic sequences and its three subsets with 200, 400 and 2,000 genomic sequences. The estimation was performed under the human Out-of-Africa demographic model. We not only obtained an accurate human genetic map, but also found that the fluctuation of estimated recombination rate is reduced along the human genome when the sample size increases. The estimated UK10K recombination rate heterogeneity is less than that estimated from its subsets. Our results demonstrate how the sample size affects the estimated recombination rate, and analyses of a larger number of genomes result in a more precise estimation of recombination rate. The accurate genetic map based on UK10K data set is also expected to benefit other human biology researches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.