Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049698›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Uncommon

Ilaria Attili, Antonio Passaro, Pasquale Pisapia, Umberto Malapelle, Filippo de Marinis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in AtypicalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unravelling the complexity ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Uncommon and RareCancers · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilaria AttiliDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1333-6622
Antonio PassaroDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7575-3870
Pasquale PisapiaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-0620
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
Filippo de MarinisDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compound epidermal growth factor receptor (

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsafatinibcomplexdoubleEGFR TKIerlotinibgefitinibNSCLCosimertinibuncommon

Identifiers

PMID35049698
PMCPMC8774526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.