Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050203›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Comparison of a Standardized High-Fat Meal versus a High-Fat Meal Scaled to Body Mass for Measuring Postprandial Triglycerides: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Bryant H Keirns, Christina M Sciarrillo, Samantha M Hart, Sam R Emerson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryant H KeirnsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, 208 Nancy Randolph Davis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-4820
Christina M SciarrilloDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, 208 Nancy Randolph Davis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Samantha M HartDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, 208 Nancy Randolph Davis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Sam R EmersonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, 208 Nancy Randolph Davis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7439-0871
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology HR20-027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-meal triglycerides are an independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, but the ideal high-fat meal formulation has yet to be standardized and is one challenge prohibiting widespread clinical adoption of postprandial triglyceride assessment. Two general approaches often used are giving individuals a high-fat meal scaled to body weight or a standardized high-fat meal containing a set fat bolus. A recent expert panel statement has endorsed the latter, specifying 75 g of fat as an appropriate fat dosage. Despite this recommendation, no study to date has tested whether there is a difference in postprandial triglycerides or if risk classification is affected based on these different approaches. We recruited 16 generally healthy individuals with roughly equal distribution among body mass index (BMI)class (

Indexed as

blood lipidscardiovascular diseasedyslipidemiahigh-fat mealsmetabolic testingpostprandial triglyceridesrisk screening

Identifiers

PMID35050203
PMCPMC8779546
OpenAlexW4205278495

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.