ArticleBiomolecules2021
Predicting Diagnostic Potential of Cathepsin in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Design Validated by Computational, Biophysical and Electrochemical Data.
Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Fatty Acid-Guided Biosensor Design for Neutrophil Gelatinase, a Prognostic and Diagnostic Biomarker for Chronic Kidney Disease.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Cathepsin K in Pathological Conditions and New Therapeutic and Diagnostic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer remains one of the leading variants of gynecological cancer with a high mortality rate. Feasibility and technical competence for screening and detection of epithelial ovarian cancer remain a major obstacle and the development of point of care diagnostics (POCD) may offer a simple solution for monitoring its progression. Cathepsins have been implicated as biomarkers for cancer progression and metastasis; being a protease, it has an inherent tendency to interact with Cystatin C, a cysteine protease inhibitor. This interaction was assessed for designing a POCD module.
methodsA combinatorial approach encompassing computational, biophysical and electron-transfer kinetics has been used to assess this protease-inhibitor interaction.
resultsCalculations predicted two cathepsin candidates, Cathepsin K and Cathepsin L based on their binding energies and structural alignment and both predictions were confirmed experimentally. Differential pulse voltammetry was used to verify the potency of Cathepsin K and Cathepsin L interaction with Cystatin C and assess the selectivity and sensitivity of their electrochemical interactions. Electrochemical measurements indicated selectivity for both the ligands, but with increasing concentrations, there was a marked difference in the sensitivity of the detection.
conclusionsThis work validated the utility of dry-lab integration in the wet-lab technique to generate leads for the design of electrochemical diagnostics for epithelial ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.