ReviewBiomolecules2022
Mass Spectrometry-Based Structural Proteomics for Metal Ion/Protein Binding Studies.
Review in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological Consequences and Assessment Methods Analysis of Fixed Orthodontic Appliances on Oral Epithelial Cells: A Systematic Review.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Development of a novel hydroxylated recombinant human type III collagen TD-1-HrHC in Komagataella phaffii with transdermal and skin damage repair activity.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Macromolecular crystallography for mammalian body temperature in support of molecular biophysics methods.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Protein Structure Characterization.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
- Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Provides Insights into the Role of Drosophila Testis-Specific Myosin VI Light Chain AndroCaM.Biochemistry · 2024Article
- Characterization of Higher Order Structural Changes of a Thermally Stressed Monoclonal Antibody via Mass Spectrometry Footprinting and Other Biophysical Approaches.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Proteomic analysis identifies HMGA2 as a novel biomarker of overall survival in papillary renal cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Metal ions are critical for the biological and physiological functions of many proteins. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based structural proteomics is an ever-growing field that has been adopted to study protein and metal ion interactions. Native MS offers information on metal binding and its stoichiometry. Footprinting approaches coupled with MS, including hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX), "fast photochemical oxidation of proteins" (FPOP) and targeted amino-acid labeling, identify binding sites and regions undergoing conformational changes. MS-based titration methods, including "protein-ligand interactions by mass spectrometry, titration and HD exchange" (PLIMSTEX) and "ligand titration, fast photochemical oxidation of proteins and mass spectrometry" (LITPOMS), afford binding stoichiometry, binding affinity, and binding order. These MS-based structural proteomics approaches, their applications to answer questions regarding metal ion protein interactions, their limitations, and recent and potential improvements are discussed here. This review serves as a demonstration of the capabilities of these tools and as an introduction to wider applications to solve other questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.