Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059839›Full record

GuidelineSurgical endoscopy2022

EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022.

Francesco M Carrano, Angelo Iossa, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Gianfranco Silecchia, Katerina-Maria Kontouli, Dimitris Mavridis, Isaias Alarçon, Daniel M Felsenreich, Sergi Sanchez-Cordero, Angelo Di Vincenzo and 19 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Francesco M CarranoPhD Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133, Rome, Italy.
Angelo IossaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence IFSO-EC, Rome, Italy.
Nicola Di LorenzoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco SilecchiaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, "La Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Bariatric Centre of Excellence IFSO-EC, Rome, Italy.
Katerina-Maria KontouliDepartment of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Dimitris MavridisDepartment of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Isaias AlarçonUnit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocío", 41010, Sevilla, Spain.
Daniel M FelsenreichDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Vienna, Austria.
Sergi Sanchez-CorderoGeneral Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari de L'Anoia, Barcelona, Spain.
Angelo Di VincenzoInternal Medicine 3, Department of Medicine, DIMED; Center for the Study and the Integrated Treatment of Obesity, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
M Carmen Balagué-PonzHospital Sant Pau, UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
Rachel L BatterhamCentre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK.
Nicole BouvyDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Catalin CopaescuDepartment of General Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital Regina Maria, Bucharest, Romania.
Dror DickerDepartment of Internal Medicine D, Rabin Medical Center, Hasharon Hospital, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Martin FriedCenter for Treatment of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, OB Klinika, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniela GodorojaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ponderas Academic Hospital Regina Maria, Bucharest, Romania.
David GoiteinSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jason C G HalfordDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Marina KalogridakiEmergency Department, General Hospital of Attica "KAT", Athens, Greece.
Maurizio De LucaDivision of General Surgery, Castelfranco and Montebelluna Hospitals, Treviso, Italy.
Salvador Morales-CondeUnit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital "Virgen del Rocío", 41010, Sevilla, Spain.
Gerhard PragerDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea PucciCentre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK.
Ramon VilallongaEndocrine, Metabolic and Bariatric Unit, General Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Center of Excellence for the EAC-BC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Iris ZaniEASO Patient Task Force, Middlesex, UK.
Per Olav VandvikDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Stavros A AntoniouSurgical Department, Mediterranean Hospital of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus. guidelines@eaes.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-6748
EAES Bariatric Surgery Guidelines Group
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESMedical University of Vienna · ATNational Institute for Health Research · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITConsorci Sanitari Garraf · ESCyprus University of Technology · CYDélégation Paris 5 · FRHospital de Sant Pau · ESKAT General Hospital of Attica · GRMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLOspedale Castelfranco Veneto · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Bariatric Guidelines Group identified a gap in bariatric surgery recommendations with a structured, contextualized consideration of multiple bariatric interventions.

objectiveTo provide evidence-informed, transparent and trustworthy recommendations on the use of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, gastric plication, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, one anastomosis gastric bypass, and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity and metabolic diseases. Only laparoscopic procedures in adults were considered.

methodsA European interdisciplinary panel including general surgeons, obesity physicians, anesthetists, a psychologist and a patient representative informed outcome importance and minimal important differences. We conducted a systematic review and frequentist fixed and random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) using the graph theory approach for each outcome. We calculated the odds ratio or the (standardized) mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA and GRADE methodologies. We considered the risk/benefit outcomes within a GRADE evidence to decision framework to arrive at recommendations, which were validated through an anonymous Delphi process of the panel.

resultsWe identified 43 records reporting on 24 RCTs. Most network information surrounded sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Under consideration of the certainty of the evidence and evidence to decision parameters, we suggest sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and gastric plication for the management of severe obesity and associated metabolic diseases. One anastomosis gastric bypass and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are suggested as alternatives, although evidence on benefits and harms, and specific selection criteria is limited compared to sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp:  https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/Lpv2kE

conclusionsThis rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, pertinent recommendations on the use of bariatric and metabolic surgery for the management of severe obesity and metabolic diseases. The guideline replaces relevant recommendations published in the EAES Bariatric Guidelines 2020.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultConsensusGastrectomyGRADE ApproachHumansMotion PicturesTreatment OutcomeAGREE IIBariatric surgeryCINeMAEAESGRADEGuidelinesMetabolic surgerySevere obesity

Identifiers

PMID35059839
OpenAlexW4206840164

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.