ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2022
Uniparental markers reveal new insights on subcontinental ancestry and sex-biased admixture in Brazil.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Brazilian population is a product of asymmetric admixture among European men and Amerindian and African women. However, Brazilian subcontinental ancestry is scarcely documented, especially regarding its African roots. Here, we aimed to unveil the uniparental continental and subcontinental contributions from distinct Brazilian regions, including South (n = 43), Southeast (n = 71), the poorly genetically characterized Central-Western region (n = 323), and a subset of unique Brazilian Amerindians (n = 24), in the context of their genome-wide ancestral contributions. The overwhelming majority of European Y haplogroups (85%) contrast sharply with the predominant African and Amerindian mtDNA haplogroups (73.2%) in admixed populations, whereas in Amerindians, non-Native haplogroups could only be detected through the paternal line. Our in-depth investigation of uniparental markers showed signals of an Andean and Central-Brazilian Amerindian maternal contribution to Southeastern and Central-Western Brazil (83.1 ± 2.1% and 56.9 ± 0.2%, respectively), the last having the highest paternal Amerindian ancestry yet described for an admixed Brazilian region (9.7%) and contrasting with higher Southern-Brazilian Amerindian contribution to Southern Brazil (59.6 ± 1%). Unlike the higher African Bantu contribution previously reported for the South and Southeast, a relevant Western African non-Bantu contribution was detected in those regions (85.7 ± 5% and 71.8 ± 10.8% respectively). In contrast, a higher Bantu contribution was described for the first time in the Central-West (64.8 ± 1.3% maternal and 86.9 ± 9.6% paternal). We observed sex-biased signatures consistent with the historically recorded Brazilian colonization and added new insights in the subcontinental maternal ancestry of Brazilians from regions never studied at this level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35061071What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.