Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064716›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2022

One-week escitalopram intake alters the excitation-inhibition balance in the healthy female brain.

Rachel G Zsido, Eóin N Molloy, Elena Cesnaite, Gergana Zheleva, Nathalie Beinhölzl, Ulrike Scharrer, Fabian A Piecha, Ralf Regenthal, Arno Villringer, Vadim V Nikulin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel G ZsidoEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-5871
Eóin N MolloyEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7804-2214
Elena CesnaiteDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Gergana ZhelevaEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Nathalie BeinhölzlEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrike ScharrerEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Fabian A PiechaEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Ralf RegenthalDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Rudolf Boehm Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7292-1859
Arno VillringerInternational Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2604-2404
Vadim V NikulinInternational Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6082-3859
Julia SacherEmotion Neuroimaging Lab, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-0558
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEInstitute of Pharmacology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural health relies on cortical excitation-inhibition balance (EIB). Previous research suggests a link between increased cortical excitation and neuroplasticity induced by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Whether there are modulations of EIB following SSRI-administration in the healthy human brain, however, remains unclear. Thus, in a randomized double-blind study, we administered a clinically relevant dose of 20 mg escitalopram for 7 days (time when steady state is achieved) in 59 healthy women (28 escitalopram, 31 placebo) on oral contraceptives. We acquired resting-state electroencephalography data at baseline, after a single dose, and at steady state. We assessed 1/f slope of the power spectrum as a marker of EIB, compared individual trajectories of 1/f slope changes contrasting single dose and 1-week drug intake, and tested the relationship of escitalopram plasma levels and cortical excitatory and inhibitory balance shifts. Escitalopram-intake was associated with decreased 1/f slope, indicating an EIB shift in favor of excitation. Furthermore, 1/f slope at baseline and after a single dose of escitalopram was associated with 1/f slope at steady state. Higher plasma escitalopram levels at a single dose were associated with better maintenance of these EIB changes throughout the drug administration week. These findings demonstrate the potential for 1/f slope to predict individual cortical responsivity to SSRIs and widen the lens through which we map the human brain by testing an interventional psychopharmacological design in a clearly defined endocrinological state.

Indexed as

CitalopramEscitalopramBrainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsCitalopramEscitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsaperiodic spectral componentcortical plasticityescitalopramexcitation-inhibition balanceresting-state electroencephalographysex hormones

Identifiers

PMID35064716
PMCPMC8933318
OpenAlexW4207038977

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.