SynthesisJournal of neurology2022
Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis have not affected the incidence of neoplasms in clinical trials over 3 decades: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Early Economic Feasibility of a Curative Gene Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis Using a Risk-Adjusted Valuation Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of sex hormones and gender diversity in multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Article
- Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Concurrent CNS tumors and multiple sclerosis: retrospective single-center cohort study and lessons for the clinical management.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur study aimed to estimate the incidence of neoplasms in clinical trials of DMTs for MS and to test the hypothesis that DMTs increase the risk of neoplasms in the duration of MS randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsData were extracted from 42 RCTs of DMTs published between 1991 and 2020. The incidence rate (IR) of neoplasms was estimated by pooling the neoplasms in the active and placebo-treatment arm per patient-year. The neoplasm incidence rate ratio (IRR) of active over placebo-treatment arms was used as measure of the effect of DMTs on the risk of developing neoplasms.
resultsThe meta-analysis included 10,638 placebo and 16,360 active-treatment arm patients. A non-significant pooled neoplasm incidence rate ratio (IRR: 1.0797; 95% CI: 0.8281 to 1.4077; P = 0.5711) with no heterogeneity (I
conclusionsOur study indicates that treatment with DMTs has not modified the risk of neoplasms in MS clinical trials from 1991 to 2020, which may reflect a low carcinogenic potential of DMTs and/or that the neoplasia latencies far exceed the typical MS trial observation periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.