Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35069986›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2021

Strategies to improve regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells.

Mahmood S Choudhery

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of stem cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Innovative approaches for the treatment of stroke: a recent update.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  5. Stem cells as biological drugs for incurable diseases.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Combined Light and Thermal Stimulation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmood S ChoudheryDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
King Edward Medical University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, stem cell-based therapies have gained attention worldwide for various diseases and disorders. Adult stem cells, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are preferred due to their significant regenerative potential in cellular therapies and are currently involved in hundreds of clinical trials. Although MSCs have high self-renewal as well as differentiation potential, such abilities are compromised with "advanced age" and "disease status" of the donor. Similarly, cell-based therapies require high cell number for clinical applications that often require

Indexed as

Caloric restrictionGrowth factorsHeat shockHypoxiaStem cell aging

Identifiers

PMID35069986
PMCPMC8727227
OpenAlexW4200295895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.