Evidence mapPaperPMID 35079730Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2022

COVID-19 hospital and emergency department visitor policies in the United States: Impact on persons with cognitive or physical impairment or receiving end-of-life care.

Alexander X Lo, Logan K Wedel, Shan W Liu, Thiti Wongtangman, Phraewa Thatphet, Ilianna Santangelo, Anita N Chary, Paul D Biddinger, Corita R Grudzen, Maura Kennedy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Caregivers are not visitors.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander X LoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Logan K WedelDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Shan W LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Thiti WongtangmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Phraewa ThatphetDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ilianna SantangeloDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Anita N CharyDepartments of Medicine and Emergency Medicine Baylor College of Medicine.
Paul D BiddingerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Corita R GrudzenRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Population Health NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA.
Maura KennedyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USKhon Kaen University · THMass General Brigham · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the national distribution of COVID-19 hospital and emergency department visitor restriction policies across the United States, focusing on patients with cognitive or physical impairment or receiving end-of-life care.

methodsCross-sectional study of visitor policies and exceptions, using a nationally representative random sample of EDs and hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, by trained study investigators using standardized instrument.

resultsOf the 352 hospitals studied, 326 (93%) had a COVID-19 hospital-wide visitor restriction policy and 164 (47%) also had an ED-specific policy. Hospital-wide policies were more prevalent at academic than non-academic (96% vs 90%;

conclusionAlthough the benefits of visitor policies towards curbing COVID-19 transmission had not been firmly established, such policies were widespread among US hospitals. Exceptions that permitted family or other caregivers for patients with cognitive or physical impairments or receiving end-of-life care were predominantly lacking, as were policies in non-English languages.

Indexed as

COVID‐19dementiadisabilityend‐of‐lifehealth disparitiesolder adultsvisitor policy

Identifiers

PMID35079730
PMCPMC8776041
OpenAlexW4206037317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.