ArticlePloS one2022
Experimental determination of Escherichia coli biomass composition for constraint-based metabolic modeling.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Genome to Function: Metabolism-Wide Models of Lifecycle Stages of Parasites.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- High-Wavenumber Raman Spectroscopy for the Identification and Biochemical Characterization of Microbial Species.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Genome-Scale Model Reconstruction Strategies forMetabolites · 2025Article
- Glycolytic ATP production enables rapid mammalian cell growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- System-level characterization of engineered and evolved formatotrophicSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- Cryo-EM reveals remodeling of a tandem riboswitch at 2.9 Å resolution.Research square · 2025Article
- BioModTool: from biomass composition data to structured biomass objective functions for genome-scale metabolic models.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- BayesianSSA: a Bayesian statistical model based on structural sensitivity analysis for predicting responses to enzyme perturbations in metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A hierarchy of metabolite exchanges in metabolic models of microbial species and communities.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Quantitative principles of microbial metabolism shared across scales.Nature microbiology · 2024Review
- Omics data analysis reveals the system-level constraint on cellular amino acid composition.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024Article
- Metabolic modeling of Halomonas campaniensis improves polyhydroxybutyrate production under nitrogen limitation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- StressME: Unified computing framework of Escherichia coli metabolism, gene expression, and stress responses.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Genome-scale metabolic models reveal determinants of phenotypic differences in non-Saccharomyces yeasts.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Balancing biomass reaction stoichiometry and measured fluxes in flux balance analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are mathematical representations of metabolism that allow for in silico simulation of metabolic phenotypes and capabilities. A prerequisite for these predictions is an accurate representation of the biomolecular composition of the cell necessary for replication and growth, implemented in GEMs as the so-called biomass objective function (BOF). The BOF contains the metabolic precursors required for synthesis of the cellular macro- and micromolecular constituents (e.g. protein, RNA, DNA), and its composition is highly dependent on the particular organism, strain, and growth condition. Despite its critical role, the BOF is rarely constructed using specific measurements of the modeled organism, drawing the validity of this approach into question. Thus, there is a need to establish robust and reliable protocols for experimental condition-specific biomass determination. Here, we address this challenge by presenting a general pipeline for biomass quantification, evaluating its performance on Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 sampled during balanced exponential growth under controlled conditions in a batch-fermentor set-up. We significantly improve both the coverage and molecular resolution compared to previously published workflows, quantifying 91.6% of the biomass. Our measurements display great correspondence with previously reported measurements, and we were also able to detect subtle characteristics specific to the particular E. coli strain. Using the modified E. coli GEM iML1515a, we compare the feasible flux ranges of our experimentally determined BOF with the original BOF, finding that the changes in BOF coefficients considerably affect the attainable fluxes at the genome-scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.