Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085271›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Experimental determination of Escherichia coli biomass composition for constraint-based metabolic modeling.

Vetle Simensen, Christian Schulz, Emil Karlsen, Signe Bråtelund, Idun Burgos, Lilja Brekke Thorfinnsdottir, Laura García-Calvo, Per Bruheim, Eivind Almaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Glycolytic ATP production enables rapid mammalian cell growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vetle SimensenDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2511-1052
Christian SchulzDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6763-6551
Emil KarlsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Signe BråtelundDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Idun BurgosDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lilja Brekke ThorfinnsdottirDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Laura García-CalvoDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Per BruheimDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eivind AlmaasDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are mathematical representations of metabolism that allow for in silico simulation of metabolic phenotypes and capabilities. A prerequisite for these predictions is an accurate representation of the biomolecular composition of the cell necessary for replication and growth, implemented in GEMs as the so-called biomass objective function (BOF). The BOF contains the metabolic precursors required for synthesis of the cellular macro- and micromolecular constituents (e.g. protein, RNA, DNA), and its composition is highly dependent on the particular organism, strain, and growth condition. Despite its critical role, the BOF is rarely constructed using specific measurements of the modeled organism, drawing the validity of this approach into question. Thus, there is a need to establish robust and reliable protocols for experimental condition-specific biomass determination. Here, we address this challenge by presenting a general pipeline for biomass quantification, evaluating its performance on Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 sampled during balanced exponential growth under controlled conditions in a batch-fermentor set-up. We significantly improve both the coverage and molecular resolution compared to previously published workflows, quantifying 91.6% of the biomass. Our measurements display great correspondence with previously reported measurements, and we were also able to detect subtle characteristics specific to the particular E. coli strain. Using the modified E. coli GEM iML1515a, we compare the feasible flux ranges of our experimentally determined BOF with the original BOF, finding that the changes in BOF coefficients considerably affect the attainable fluxes at the genome-scale.

Indexed as

BiomassComputer SimulationEscherichia coli K12Genome, BacterialModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID35085271
PMCPMC8794083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.