Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098341›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2022

Genomic and functional conservation of lncRNAs: lessons from flies.

Carlos Camilleri-Robles, Raziel Amador, Cecilia C Klein, Roderic Guigó, Montserrat Corominas, Marina Ruiz-Romero

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mapping rat lncRNA Bdnf-as.Molecular biology reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Epigenetic Regulation in Drosophila Tumor Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Long non-coding RNAs involved inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Camilleri-RoblesDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia I Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-8354
Raziel AmadorDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia I Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Cecilia C KleinDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia I Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-5994
Roderic GuigóCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-4477
Montserrat CorominasDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia I Estadística, Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0724-8346
Marina Ruiz-RomeroCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. marina.ruiz@crg.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-8382-1052
Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

GENCODE Resource ProjectU41HG007234 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI FLICEK, PAUL · 2013 to 2020
$20.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, the increasing interest in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has led to the discovery of these transcripts in multiple organisms. LncRNAs tend to be specifically, and often lowly, expressed in certain tissues, cell types and biological contexts. Although lncRNAs participate in the regulation of a wide variety of biological processes, including development and disease, most of their functions and mechanisms of action remain unknown. Poor conservation of the DNA sequences encoding for these transcripts makes the identification of lncRNAs orthologues among different species very challenging, especially between evolutionarily distant species such as flies and humans or mice. However, the functions of lncRNAs are unexpectedly preserved among different species supporting the idea that conservation occurs beyond DNA sequences and reinforcing the potential of characterising lncRNAs in animal models. In this review, we describe the features and roles of lncRNAs in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, focusing on genomic and functional comparisons with human and mouse lncRNAs. We also discuss the current state of advances and limitations in the study of lncRNA conservation and future perspectives.

Indexed as

RNA, Long NoncodingAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophila melanogasterGenomeGenomicsHumansMiceRNA, Long NoncodingComparative genomicsConservationDevelopmentDrosophila melanogasterFliesLncRNAs

Identifiers

PMID35098341
PMCPMC9114055
OpenAlexW4213045480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.