Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100897›Full record

SynthesisNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2022

Quantifying Quality of Reaching Movements Longitudinally Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review.

M Saes, M I Mohamed Refai, B J F van Beijnum, J B J Bussmann, E P Jansma, P H Veltink, J H Buurke, E E H van Wegen, C G M Meskers, J W Krakauer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

M SaesDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-3192
M I Mohamed RefaiDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3617-5131
B J F van BeijnumDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
J B J BussmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, 6993University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-5636
E P JansmaMedical Library, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
P H VeltinkDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
J H BuurkeDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
E E H van WegenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7920-9995
C G M MeskersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-5611
J W KrakauerDepartments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
G KwakkelDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4674-0907
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Twente · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLErasmus MC · NLJohns Hopkins University · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisambiguation of behavioral restitution from compensation is important to better understand recovery of upper limb motor control post-stroke and subsequently design better interventions. Measuring quality of movement (QoM) during standardized performance assays and functional tasks using kinematic and kinetic metrics potentially allows for this disambiguation.

objectivesTo identify longitudinal studies that used kinematic and/or kinetic metrics to investigate post-stroke recovery of reaching and assess whether these studies distinguish behavioral restitution from compensation.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Wiley/Cochrane Library up to July 1st, 2020. Studies were identified if they performed longitudinal kinematic and/or kinetic measurements during reaching, starting within the first 6 months post-stroke.

resultsThirty-two longitudinal studies were identified, which reported a total of forty-six different kinematic metrics. Although the majority investigated improvements in kinetics or kinematics to quantify recovery of QoM, none of these studies explicitly addressed the distinction between behavioral restitution and compensation. One study obtained kinematic metrics for both performance assays and a functional task.

conclusionsDespite the growing number of kinematic and kinetic studies on post-stroke recovery, longitudinal studies that explicitly seek to delineate between behavioral restitution and compensation are still lacking in the literature. To rectify this situation, future studies should measure kinematics and/or kinetics during performance assays to isolate restitution and during a standardized functional task to determine the contributions of restitution and compensation.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKineticsMovementRecovery of FunctionUpper Extremitybehavioral restitutionbiomechanicscompensationkinematicslongitudinal studiesreachingrecoverystrokesystematic reviewupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID35100897
PMCPMC8902693
OpenAlexW4210448999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.