Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35102247›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2022

The clinician's guide to interpreting a regression analysis.

Sofia Bzovsky, Mark R Phillips, Robyn H Guymer, Charles C Wykoff, Lehana Thabane, Mohit Bhandari, Varun Chaudhary, R.E.T.I.N.A. study group

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Linear and logistic regression models: when to use and how to interpret them?Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofia BzovskyDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mark R PhillipsDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0923-261X
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9441-4356
Charles C WykoffRetina Consultants of Texas (Retina Consultants of America), Houston, TX, USA.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0355-9734
Mohit BhandariDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-4808
Varun ChaudharyDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. vchaudh@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-4146
R.E.T.I.N.A. study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID35102247
PMCPMC9391441

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.