Evidence mapPaperPMID 35103408Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2022

Crosswalk between the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-27/30/40).

Jakub P Hlávka, Jeffrey C Yu, Darius N Lakdawalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-term value of lecanemab to individuals and families.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub P HlávkaSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-390X
Jeffrey C YuLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Darius N LakdawallaSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062277NIH HHS R01AG062277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe develop a crosswalk between the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)-27, TICS-30, and TICS-40 for adults 65 years and older.

methodsWe examined the scores of 1809 participants, with and without cognitive impairment, who completed the MMSE and the TICS assessment in the 2016 Health and Retirement Study and the 2016 Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol study. Crosswalks between MMSE and TICS-27/30/40 were developed via equipercentile equating.

resultsWe present crosswalks for MMSE and TICS-27/30/40 for the 65+ population representative of the US elderly. While monotonic, the pattern of the TICS-30 to MMSE crosswalk differs from the other two crosswalks (MMSE to TICS-27/40).

conclusionOur analysis offers an empirical crosswalk between two commonly used cognitive measures-the MMSE and TICS. Our findings suggest the need for validated and robust measures that allow for the comparison of scores on different cognitive scales.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionAdultAgedCognitionHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTelephoneAlzheimer's diseasecrosswalkdementia, Mini-Mental State ExaminationTelephone Interview for Cognitive Status

Identifiers

PMID35103408
PMCPMC10373741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.