Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106752›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2022

Community guidelines for GPCR ligand bias: IUPHAR review 32.

Peter Kolb, Terry Kenakin, Stephen P H Alexander, Marcel Bermudez, Laura M Bohn, Christian S Breinholt, Michel Bouvier, Stephen J Hill, Evi Kostenis, Kirill A Martemyanov and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. G protein signaling capabilities at the bradykinin 2 receptor.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The working lives of neuronal 5-HTRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Investigation into ligand selectivity and bias at the formyl peptide receptor family.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  17. Biased Allosteric Modulation in GPCR Drug Discovery.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Endogenous forms of ATP-ATPProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Peter KolbDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4089-614X
Terry KenakinDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Stephen P H AlexanderSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-497X
Marcel BermudezDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7421-3282
Laura M BohnDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-8179
Christian S BreinholtDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6839-1931
Michel BouvierDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1128-0100
Stephen J HillSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-239X
Evi KostenisMolecular, Cellular, and Pharmacobiology Section, Institute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kirill A MartemyanovDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9925-7599
Rick R NeubigDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
H Ongun OnaranMolecular Biology and Technology Development Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-4774
Sudarshan RajagopalDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3443-5040
Bryan L RothDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jana SelentResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1844-4449
Arun K ShuklaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Martha E SommerInstitute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David E GloriamDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-7561
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBAnkara University · TRBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDuke Medical Center · USIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur · INInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer · CAMichigan State University · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/S/20/1/504916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GPCRs modulate a plethora of physiological processes and mediate the effects of one-third of FDA-approved drugs. Depending on which ligand activates a receptor, it can engage different intracellular transducers. This 'biased signalling' paradigm requires that we now characterize physiological signalling not just by receptors but by ligand-receptor pairs. Ligands eliciting biased signalling may constitute better drugs with higher efficacy and fewer adverse effects. However, ligand bias is very complex, making reproducibility and description challenging. Here, we provide guidelines and terminology for any scientists to design and report ligand bias experiments. The guidelines will aid consistency and clarity, as the basic receptor research and drug discovery communities continue to advance our understanding and exploitation of ligand bias. Scientific insight, biosensors, and analytical methods are still evolving and should benefit from and contribute to the implementation of the guidelines, together improving translation from in vitro to disease-relevant in vivo models.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionDrug DiscoveryLigandsReproducibility of ResultsLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID35106752
PMCPMC7612872
OpenAlexW4210780590

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.