Evidence mapPaperPMID 35107429Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Low-Carbohydrate Nutritional Coaching to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Control: Randomized Quality Improvement Program.

Dina H Griauzde, Grace Ling, Daniel Wray, Melissa DeJonckheere, Kara Mizokami Stout, Laura R Saslow, Jill Fenske, David Serlin, Spring Stonebraker, Tabassum Nisha and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Postprandial Glucose: A Variable in Continuum.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dina H GriauzdeVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-0299
Grace LingDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-5101
Daniel WrayTwine Clinical Consulting LLC, Park City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-208X
Melissa DeJonckheereInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-3358
Kara Mizokami StoutVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6933-2586
Laura R SaslowDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3991-3205
Jill FenskeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-4729
David SerlinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7026-4149
Spring StonebrakerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0277-6801
Tabassum NishaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-6464
Colton BarryDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4527-2336
Rodica Pop-BusuiDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-1350
Ananda SenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9632-6704
Caroline R RichardsonInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-6046

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2022 to 2025
$4.9M
Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK092926 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$779k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with adverse health consequences largely related to hyperglycemia. Despite clinical practice guideline recommendations, effective pharmacotherapy, and interventions to support patients and providers, up to 60% of patients diagnosed with T2DM are estimated to have hemoglobin A

objectiveThe aim of this study is to compare changes in HbA

methodsThis was a 12-month, pragmatic, randomized quality improvement program. All adult patients with T2DM who received primary care at a university-affiliated primary care clinic (N=1584) were randomized to either the UC or the enhanced care (EC) group. Within each program arm, we identified individuals with HbA

resultsHbA

conclusionsAmong patients with suboptimally controlled T2DM, a combined approach that includes continuous glucose monitoring and low-carbohydrate nutrition counseling can improve glycemic control compared with the standard of care.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MentoringAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlycated HemoglobinHumansQuality ImprovementBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobincontinuous glucose monitoringlow-carbohydrate counselingtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35107429
PMCPMC8851329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.