Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107432›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Disease Progression of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Modeling Using Machine Learning.

Matej Pičulin, Tim Smole, Bojan Žunkovič, Enja Kokalj, Marko Robnik-Šikonja, Matjaž Kukar, Dimitrios I Fotiadis, Vasileios C Pezoulas, Nikolaos S Tachos, Fausto Barlocco and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Matej Pičulin *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-476X
Tim Smole *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-7628
Bojan Žunkovič *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5085-2506
Enja Kokalj *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8158-767X
Marko Robnik-Šikonja *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1232-3320
Matjaž Kukar *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-7947
Dimitrios I Fotiadis *Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-5082
Vasileios C Pezoulas *Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-693X
Nikolaos S Tachos *Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-6352
Fausto Barlocco *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-8459
Francesco Mazzarotto *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-9980
Dejana Popović *Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-5872
Lars S Maier *Department of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology, Pneumology, Intensive Care Medicine), University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-4429
Lazar Velicki *Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-819X
Iacopo Olivotto *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-9266
Guy A MacGowan *Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-4165
Djordje G Jakovljević *Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-6542
Nenad Filipović *Bioengineering Research and Development Center, Kragujevac, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-5615
Zoran Bosnić *Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-7146
University of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Ioannina · GRCoventry University · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Kragujevac · RSUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disorders in general are responsible for 30% of deaths worldwide. Among them, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiac disease that is present in about 1 of 500 young adults and can cause sudden cardiac death (SCD).

objectiveAlthough the current state-of-the-art methods model the risk of SCD for patients, to the best of our knowledge, no methods are available for modeling the patient's clinical status up to 10 years ahead. In this paper, we propose a novel machine learning (ML)-based tool for predicting disease progression for patients diagnosed with HCM in terms of adverse remodeling of the heart during a 10-year period.

methodsThe method consisted of 6 predictive regression models that independently predict future values of 6 clinical characteristics: left atrial size, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional classification, left ventricular internal diastolic diameter, and left ventricular internal systolic diameter. We supplemented each prediction with the explanation that is generated using the Shapley additive explanation method.

resultsThe final experiments showed that predictive error is lower on 5 of the 6 constructed models in comparison to experts (on average, by 0.34) or a consortium of experts (on average, by 0.22). The experiments revealed that semisupervised learning and the artificial data from virtual patients help improve predictive accuracies. The best-performing random forest model improved R

conclusionsBy engaging medical experts to provide interpretation and validation of the results, we determined the models' favorable performance compared to the performance of experts for 5 of 6 targets.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencecardiomyopathycardiovascular diseasedisease progressionhypertrophic cardiomyopathymachine learningMLpredictionprediction modelSCDsudden cardiac deathvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35107432
PMCPMC8851344
OpenAlexW4210371455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.