ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022
Disease Progression of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Modeling Using Machine Learning.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular diagnostics: a systematic review and descriptive analysis of clinical applications and diagnostic performance.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Precision Monitoring Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Review of Molecular Indicators for Early Detection and Risk Stratification.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: turns and loopholes.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Review
- Review
- Synthetic data generation methods in healthcare: A review on open-source tools and methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Development of a Cohort Analytics Tool for Monitoring Progression Patterns in Cardiovascular Diseases: Advanced Stochastic Modeling Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology.Artificial intelligence review · 2024Article
- Computational Modeling on Drugs Effects for Left Ventricle in Cardiomyopathy Disease.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
- Machine Learning for Online Automatic Prediction of Common Disease Attributes Using Never-Ending Image Learner.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of machine learning and Computer Coded Verbal Autopsy (CCVA) algorithms for cause of death determination: A comparative analysis of data from rural South Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Internet of Medical Things Enabled Multimodal Framework: Deep Machine Learning for Chronic Cardiac Disease Prediction in Healthcare 5.0.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disorders in general are responsible for 30% of deaths worldwide. Among them, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiac disease that is present in about 1 of 500 young adults and can cause sudden cardiac death (SCD).
objectiveAlthough the current state-of-the-art methods model the risk of SCD for patients, to the best of our knowledge, no methods are available for modeling the patient's clinical status up to 10 years ahead. In this paper, we propose a novel machine learning (ML)-based tool for predicting disease progression for patients diagnosed with HCM in terms of adverse remodeling of the heart during a 10-year period.
methodsThe method consisted of 6 predictive regression models that independently predict future values of 6 clinical characteristics: left atrial size, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional classification, left ventricular internal diastolic diameter, and left ventricular internal systolic diameter. We supplemented each prediction with the explanation that is generated using the Shapley additive explanation method.
resultsThe final experiments showed that predictive error is lower on 5 of the 6 constructed models in comparison to experts (on average, by 0.34) or a consortium of experts (on average, by 0.22). The experiments revealed that semisupervised learning and the artificial data from virtual patients help improve predictive accuracies. The best-performing random forest model improved R
conclusionsBy engaging medical experts to provide interpretation and validation of the results, we determined the models' favorable performance compared to the performance of experts for 5 of 6 targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.