Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107751›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2022

Research Progress of LncRNAs in Atrial Fibrillation.

Wenhui Wang, Bei Tian, Zhongping Ning, Xinming Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenhui WangTongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200082, China.
Bei TianDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, No. 1500 of Zhouyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 201318, China.
Zhongping NingDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, No. 1500 of Zhouyuan Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 201318, China.
Xinming LiShanghai Pudong New Area Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200136, China. xinming06@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-6728
Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CNShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias in adults, with high morbidity and increased mortality risk. In recent years, the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and mechanistic research of AF have increased exponentially, and regulation based on the potential molecular mechanism of AF is a research hotspot. Long noncoding RNAs (LncRNAs), usually refer to noncoding RNA transcripts greater than 200 nucleotides in length, have been shown to play a role in cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, and myocardial fibrosis through various regulatory methods. An increasing number of researchers have begun to pay attention to the identification and function of LncRNAs in AF. This article reviews changes in the expression of related LncRNAs detected in AF and describes the LncRNAs that play a regulatory role in AF-related processes, to explore the potential of LncRNAs as new biomarkers and therapeutic targets in AF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationRNA, Long NoncodingAdultBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersRNA, Long NoncodingAtrial fibrillationBiomarkerDifferential expressionLong noncoding RNATherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID35107751
OpenAlexW4210804383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.