ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2021
Combination of denosumab and biologic DMARDs in inflammatory muscle-skeletal diseases and connective tissue diseases.
Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual targeted therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a real-world multicenter experience from Spain.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOsteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD.
methodsThis is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls.
resultsTwenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline timepoint), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal.
conclusionThe combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.