Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112114›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2021

Projecting the long-term benefits of single pill combination therapy for patients with hypertension in five countries.

Claudio Borghi, Jiguang Wang, Anton V Rodionov, Martin Rosas, Il Suk Sohn, Luis Alcocer, William J Valentine, Daniela Deroche-Chibedi, Denis Granados, Davide Croce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudio BorghiUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jiguang WangShanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Anton V RodionovIM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Martin RosasMexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico.
Il Suk SohnKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea.
Luis AlcocerMexican Institute of Cardiovascular Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
William J ValentineOssian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniela Deroche-ChibediSanofi General Medicines, Gentilly, France.
Denis GranadosSanofi R&D, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Davide CroceUniversity Carlo Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo project the 10-year clinical outcomes associated with single pill combination (SPC) therapies compared with multi-pill regimens for the management of hypertension in five countries (Italy, Russia, China, South Korea and Mexico).

methodsA microsimulation model was designed to project health outcomes between 2020 and 2030 for populations with hypertension managed according to four different treatment pathways: current treatment practices (CTP), single drug with dosage titration then sequential addition of other agents (start low and go slow, SLGS), free choice combination with multiple pills (FCC) and combination therapy in the form of a single pill (SPC). Model inputs were derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 dataset. Simulated outcomes of mortality, chronic kidney disease (CKD), stroke, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were estimated for 1,000,000 patients on each treatment pathway.

resultsSPC therapy was projected to improve clinical outcomes over SLGS, FCC and CTP in all countries. SPC reduced mortality by 5.4% in Italy, 4.9% in Russia, 4.5% in China, 2.3% in South Korea and 3.6% in Mexico versus CTP and showed greater reductions in mortality than SLGS and FCC. The projected incidence of clinical events was reduced by 11.5% in Italy, 9.2% in Russia, 8.4% in China, 4.9% in South Korea and 6.7% in Mexico for SPC versus CTP.

conclusionsTen-year projections indicated that combination therapies (FCC and SPC) are likely to reduce the burden of hypertension compared with conventional management approaches, with SPC showing the greatest overall benefits due to improved adherence.

Indexed as

ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitorsAdherenceARBs, angiotensin receptor blockersBlood pressureBurden of diseaseCCBs, calcium channel blockersCKD, chronic kidney diseaseCTP, current treatment practicesCVD, cardiovascular diseaseDALYs, disability-adjusted life yearsFCC, free choice combination with multiple pillsGBD, Global Burden of Disease, Risk Factors, and InjuriesHypertensionIHD, ischemic heart diseaseIHME, The Institute for Health Metrics and EvaluationModelingSBP, systolic blood pressureSingle pill combinationSLGS, single drug with dosage titration first then sequential addition of other agents (start low and go slow)SPC, single pill combination

Identifiers

PMID35112114
PMCPMC8790100

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.