Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112153›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Prognostic scores in laryngeal cancer.

Niall Woodley, Alexander D G Rogers, Katie Turnbull, Mohd Afiq Mohd Slim, Trung Ton, Jenny Montgomery, Catriona Douglas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Development and validation of nomogram for predicting prognosis of patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niall WoodleyDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Alexander D G RogersDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK. Alexander.rogers@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-4119
Katie TurnbullUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mohd Afiq Mohd SlimDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Trung TonDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Jenny MontgomeryDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Catriona DouglasDepartment of ENT Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Rd, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the utility of various pre-treatment prognostic scoring systems for overall survival (OS) in laryngeal cancer, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII).

methodsWe undertook a retrospective 5-year study of 220 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing active treatment.

resultsOn multivariate analysis, low NLR (≤ 2.415, p = 0.001, OR 3.851), low PLR (≤ 269.855, p = 0.002, OR 5.520), high LMR (> 2.225, p < 0.001, OR 0.458) and low SIII (≤ 1144.465, p = 0.003, OR 3.673) were significantly associated with improved OS, accounting for confounding factors of tumour subsite, T-stage and performance status. C-reactive protein (CRP) alone (p = 0.264) and mGPS (p = 0.350) were not significantly associated with OS.

conclusionsNLR, PLR, LMR and SIII represent inexpensive, easily obtainable adjuvant decision-making tools which could help tailor individualised treatment regimes. Further investigation into the utility of combination scores and the role of different laryngeal subsites may be of interest.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsHumansLymphocytesNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesLaryngeal cancerLymphocyte-to-monocyte ratioNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioPrognostic score

Identifiers

PMID35112153
OpenAlexW4210282906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.