Evidence mapPaperPMID 35114251Full record

SynthesisProgress in cardiovascular diseases

Association of polypill therapy with cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shreya Rao, Tariq Jamal Siddiqi, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Erin D Michos, Ann Marie Navar, Thomas J Wang, Stephen J Greene, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Amit Khera, Ambarish Pandey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07032389 (Polypill Strategy for the Treatment of Patients After Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07032389 phase2recruitingnot on this map

Polypill Strategy for the Treatment of Patients After Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2025 to 2030Enrolled1,000ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsPolypill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Comparison of Fixed-Dose Clopidogrel/Asetylsalicylic Acid Combination and Standard Loading Strategy During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shreya RaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Tariq Jamal SiddiqiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States of America.
Muhammad Shahzeb KhanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States of America.
Erin D MichosDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Ann Marie NavarDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Thomas J WangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Stephen J GreeneDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Amit KheraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Ambarish PandeyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: ambarish.pandey@utsouthwestern.edu.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · USPublic Health Foundation of India · INSouthwestern Medical Center

Funding

Polypill strategy for the evidence-based management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in an underserved patient populationR01MD017529 · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · 2025 to 2025
$735k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL125247NIA NIH HHS R03 AG067960NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD017529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies have reported improvements in population-level risk factor burden and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes using polypills for CVD risk reduction. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of polypills on CVD outcomes, mortality, adherence, and side effects across different settings has not previously been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the association between polypill therapy and CVD outcomes published before February 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of major adverse CVD events (MACE). Risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes were converted to log RR and pooled using a generic inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Data for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects modeling and presented as mean differences with 95% CIs. Eight studies representing 25,584 patients were included for analysis. In the overall pooled analysis, the use of polypills was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02) and significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-1.00). The reductions in the risk of MACE with polypill use varied by baseline risk and nature of the study population (primary prevention vs. secondary prevention), with the most significant risk reduction among lower-risk cohorts, including within primary prevention populations [RR 0.70 (0.62, 0.79)]. Among measures of CVD risk factors, modest but significant reductions were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure [systolic: mean difference 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: -3.07 to -0.91); diastolic: mean difference 1.30 mmHg (95% CI: -2.42 to -0.19), but not for levels of total or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Use of the polypill strategy significantly improved drug adherence (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11-1.55) with no association between polypill use and rates of adverse events or drug discontinuation. The use of polypill formulations is associated with significant reductions in CVD risk factors and the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, particularly in the low-risk and primary prevention population.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesBlood PressureCholesterol, LDLHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLHeart diseaseMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsPolypillPrevention

Identifiers

PMID35114251
PMCPMC10535365
OpenAlexW4210409771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.