ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Evaluation methods and influencing factors of cough sensitivity.
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural mechanisms of cough: insights from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Objective Assessment of the Cough: Listening to the Patient's Voice. A Narrative Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Substance P-expressing neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediate chronic cough hypersensitivity via the hypothalamus-airway neural pathway.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Peripheral antitussives affect temporal features of tracheobronchial coughing in cats.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
- Methods of Cough Assessment and Objectivization.Physiological research · 2023Review
- Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- Similarities and differences between the cough suppression test and the cough challenge test.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased cough sensitivity is an important mechanism of chronic cough, and the evaluation of cough sensitivity helps understand the mechanism of cough and explore better methods to reduce cough. Evaluation methods may be direct or indirect. Direct methods include mechanical stimulation and chemical stimulation, and indirect methods include laryngeal reflex test, questionnaires, and brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Chemical stimulation is the most common method, while the capsaicin cough challenge test is proven and widely used. In this article, we will compare evaluation methods and explore influencing factors of cough sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.