Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123084›Full record

GuidelineClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2022

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review.

Rena Yadlapati, C Prakash Gyawali, John E Pandolfino, CGIT GERD Consensus Conference Participants

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
45.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06205446 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Application of Diaphragmatic Breathing in Patients With Disorders of Gut-brain Interaction: Impact on Gastrointestinal and Psychological Symptoms as Well as Autonomic Nervous System

TypeinterventionalSponsorBuddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled125ConditionsIrritable Bowel Syndrome, Healthy Subjects, Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Laryngopharyngeal RefluxArmsHealthy subjects : abdominal breathing, Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease subjects : abdominal breathing, Dyspepsia subjects : abdominal breathing, Irritable bowel disorder : abdominal breathing
NCT07326904 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Symptom Relief and Safety After Using Fexuprazan 40 Mg Compared to Esomeprazole 40 Mg in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled145ConditionsGastro Oesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsFexuprazan, Esomeprazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux With Atypical Symptoms: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Minimalization Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rena YadlapatiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: cprakash@wustl.edu.
John E PandolfinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
CGIT GERD Consensus Conference Participants
Northwestern University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Role of altered response to volumetric distension in esophageal diseaseP01DK117824 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KEEFER, LAURIE A · 2018 to 2022
$7.3M
Targeting Hypervigilance and Autonomic Arousal: the Psycho-physiologic Model of GERDR01DK092217 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JOHN E PANDOLFINO · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
Mechanism Guided Therapy for Laryngopharyngeal RefluxK23DK125266 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YADLAPATI, RENA HIREN · 2021 to 2025
$963k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK125266NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK117824NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAs many as one-half of all patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not derive benefit from acid suppression. This review outlines a personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approach to GERD symptoms.

methodsThe Best Practice Advice statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with extensive discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendations was not the intent of this clinical practice update. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should develop a care plan for investigation of symptoms suggestive of GERD, selection of therapy (with explanation of potential risks and benefits), and long-term management, including possible de-escalation, in a shared-decision making model with the patient. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should provide standardized educational material on GERD mechanisms, weight management, lifestyle and dietary behaviors, relaxation strategies, and awareness about the brain-gut axis relationship to patients with reflux symptoms. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should emphasize safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should provide patients presenting with troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain without alarm symptoms a 4- to 8-week trial of single-dose PPI therapy. With inadequate response, dosing can be increased to twice a day or switched to a more effective acid suppressive agent once a day. When there is adequate response, PPI should be tapered to the lowest effective dose. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: If PPI therapy is continued in a patient with unproven GERD, clinicians should evaluate the appropriateness and dosing within 12 months after initiation, and offer endoscopy with prolonged wireless reflux monitoring off PPI therapy to establish appropriateness of long-term PPI therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: If troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain do not respond adequately to a PPI trial or when alarm symptoms exist, clinicians should investigate with endoscopy and, in the absence of erosive reflux disease (Los Angeles B or greater) or long-segment (≥3 cm) Barrett's esophagus, perform prolonged wireless pH monitoring off medication (96-hour preferred if available) to confirm and phenotype GERD or to rule out GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Complete endoscopic evaluation of GERD symptoms includes inspection for erosive esophagitis (graded according to the Los Angeles classification when present), diaphragmatic hiatus (Hill grade of flap valve), axial hiatus hernia length, and inspection for Barrett's esophagus (graded according to the Prague classification and biopsied when present). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should perform upfront objective reflux testing off medication (rather than an empiric PPI trial) in patients with isolated extra-esophageal symptoms and suspicion for reflux etiology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In symptomatic patients with proven GERD, clinicians should consider ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring on PPI as an option to determine the mechanism of persisting esophageal symptoms despite therapy (if adequate expertise exists for interpretation). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Clinicians should personalize adjunctive pharmacotherapy to the GERD phenotype, in contrast to empiric use of these agents. Adjunctive agents include alginate antacids for breakthrough symptoms, nighttime H2 receptor antagonists for nocturnal symptoms, baclofen for regurgitation or belch predominant symptoms, and prokinetics for coexistent gastroparesis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Clinicians should provide pharmacologic neuromodulation, and/or referral to a behavioral therapist for hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, and relaxation strategies in patients with functional heartburn or reflux disease associated with esophageal hypervigilance reflux hypersensitivity and/or behavioral disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: In patients with proven GERD, laparoscopic fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation are effective surgical options, and transoral incisionless fundoplication is an effective endoscopic option in carefully selected patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: In patients with proven GERD, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an effective primary anti-reflux intervention in obese patients, and a salvage option in non-obese patients, whereas sleeve gastrectomy has potential to worsen GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Candidacy for invasive anti-reflux procedures includes confirmatory evidence of pathologic GERD, exclusion of achalasia, and assessment of esophageal peristaltic function.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusGastroesophageal RefluxChest PainHeartburnHumansProton Pump InhibitorsProton Pump InhibitorsAmbulatory Reflux MonitoringGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35123084
PMCPMC9838103
OpenAlexW4210756392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.