ArticleBMC primary care2022
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 12+ months of adjuvant multidisciplinary support.
Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-Term Versus Long-Term Efficacy of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in 8880 Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: comparative effectiveness, safety, and metabolic outcomes: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis of over 1.1 Million Patients.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic treatments for obesity: a clinical evidence map and systematic review to inform a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Endoscopic bariatric surgery for adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Pooled it
- IFSO Bariatric Endoscopy Committee Evidence-Based Review and Position Statement on Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity Management.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Meta-analysis of 6775 Individuals with Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Comparing Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) 30-Day Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization: A Multi-Centered Retrospective Cohort Study of 506,597 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Applications of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract disease.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Review
- Weight Loss Effect of GLP-1 RAs With Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy and Bariatric Surgeries.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023Article
- Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- The surgical management of obesity.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (LSG): A Comparative Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Gastric Sleeve: A Review of Literature.Cureus · 2023Review
- Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: is it time to prioritize minimally invasive interventions for the management of metabolic syndrome?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and the incisionless endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) weight loss procedures require further investigation of their efficacy, safety and patient-centered outcomes in the Australian setting.
methodsThe aim was to examine the 6- and 12-month weight loss efficacy, safety, and weight-related quality of life (QoL) of adults with obesity who received the ESG or LSG bariatric procedure with 12+ months of adjuvant multidisciplinary pre- and postprocedural support. Data were from a two-arm prospective cohort study that followed patients from baseline to 12-months postprocedure from a medical center in Queensland. Percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were body composition (fat mass, fat-free mass, android:gynoid ratio, bone mineral content) via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, weight-related QoL, lipid, glycemic, and hepatic biochemistry, and adverse events.
results16 ESG (19% attrition; 81.2% female; aged:41.4 (SD: 10.4) years; BMI: 35.5 (SD: 5.2) kg/m
conclusionsIn this setting, the ESG and LSG were safe and effective weight loss treatments for obese adults alongside multidisciplinary support. Patients who elected the ESG maintained fat-free mass at 6-months but both cohorts lost fat-free mass at 12-months postprocedure. Patients who elected the LSG had large and significant improvements to weight-related quality of life. Further well-powered studies are required to confirm these findings.
trial registrationThis study was registered prospectively at the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 06/03/2018, Registration Number ACTRN12618000337279 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.