Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35123497›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

The effect of light and ventilation on house entry by Anopheles arabiensis sampled using light traps in Tanzania: an experimental hut study.

Arnold S Mmbando, John Bradley, Deogratius Kazimbaya, Robert Kasubiri, Jakob Knudsen, Doreen Siria, Lorenz von Seidlein, Fredros O Okumu, Steve W Lindsay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Arnold S MmbandoEnvironmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
John BradleyMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Deogratius KazimbayaEnvironmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Robert KasubiriEnvironmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Jakob KnudsenRoyal Danish Academy - Architecture, Design and Conservation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Doreen SiriaEnvironmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Lorenz von SeidleinMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Fredros O OkumuEnvironmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Steve W LindsayDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, DH13LE, UK. s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-9050
Ifakara Health Institute · TZDurham University · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMahidol University · THRoyal Danish Academy – Architecture, Design, Conservation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa, house design and ventilation affects the number of malaria mosquito vectors entering houses. This study hypothesized that indoor light from a CDC-light trap, visible from outside a hut, would increase entry of Anopheles arabiensis, an important malaria vector, and examined whether ventilation modifies this effect.

methodsFour inhabited experimental huts, each situated within a large chamber, were used to assess how light and ventilation affect the number of hut-entering mosquitoes in Tanzania. Each night, 300 female laboratory-reared An. arabiensis were released inside each chamber for 72 nights. Nightly mosquito collections were made using light traps placed indoors. Temperature and carbon dioxide concentrations were measured using data loggers. Treatments and sleepers were rotated between huts using a randomized block design.

resultsWhen indoor light was visible outside the huts, there was an 84% increase in the odds of collecting mosquitoes indoors (Odds ratio, OR = 1.84, 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI 1.74-1.95, p < 0.001) compared with when it was not. Although the odds of collecting mosquitoes in huts with closed eaves (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72, p < 0.001) was less than those with open eaves, few mosquitoes entered either type of well-ventilated hut. The odds of collecting mosquitoes was 99% less in well-ventilated huts, compared with poorly-ventilated traditional huts (OR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01-0.03, p < 0.001). In well-ventilated huts, indoor temperatures were 1.3 °C (95% CI 0.9-1.7, p < 0.001) cooler, with lower carbon dioxide (CO

conclusionAlthough light visible from outside a hut increased mosquito house entry, good natural ventilation reduces indoor carbon dioxide concentrations, a major mosquito attractant, thereby reducing mosquito-hut entry.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaAnimalsFemaleHousingMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsTanzaniaAnopheles arabiensisHousingLight trapsMalariaTanzaniaVentilation

Identifiers

PMID35123497
PMCPMC8818140
OpenAlexW4210781344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.