ReviewInternational endodontic journal2022
A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.
Review in International endodontic journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of Cal Bio LC MTA, ProRoot MTA and NeoPutty MTA: an in vitro study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Toxicological Assessment of Cobalt-Chromium Dental Alloys: Ion Release, Cytotoxicity, and Possible Systemic Effects.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Resin-Modified Calcium Silicate-Based Materials Versus Conventional Formulations in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- In Vitro Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Materials for Retrograde Endodontic Treatment Under Different Setting Conditions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Advances in oral disease models: a mini-review of developments from 2015 to 2025.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- A combined in-silico and in-vitro evaluation of cyanoacrylate-based dental materials as an adhesive for applications in prosthodontics: molecular docking and cytocompatibility analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- Size-Dependent Bioactivity of Silver Nanoparticles and Calcium Hydroxide Mixtures Against hDPSCs: An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- In Vitro Bioactivity and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Two Root Canal Sealers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- [Chinese introduction to Preferred Reporting Items for Animal Studies in Endodontology 2021 checklist].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Article
- Chemical and Biological Properties of C-Point Obturation Cones.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microstructural and elemental characterization of novel bioactive glass bioceramic sealer using Fourier transform infrared and X-ray diffraction analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Guidance for evaluating biomaterials' properties and biological potential for dental pulp tissue engineering and regeneration research.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Impact of various endodontic sealers on HPDLF Cell viability and apoptosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- In silico assessment of biocompatibility and toxicity: molecular docking and dynamics simulation of PMMA-based dental materials for interim prosthetic restorations.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies andJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Review
- In silico toxicity and immunological interactions of components of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Genotoxicity induced by endodontic sealers: A systematic review.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and bioactivity of calcium silicate-based cements.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials used for endodontics and with direct contact to tissues have a wide range of indications, from vital pulpal treatments to root filling materials and those used in endodontic surgery. In principle, interaction with dental materials may result in damage to tissues locally or systemically. Thus, a great variety of test methods are applied to evaluate a materials' potential risk of adverse biological effects to ensure their biocompatibility before commercialization. However, the results of biocompatibility evaluations are dependent on not only the tested materials but also the test methods due to the diversity of these effects and numerous variables involved. In addition, diverse biological effects require equally diverse assessments on a structured and planned approach. Such a structured assessment of the materials consists of four phases: general toxicity, local tissue irritation, pre-clinical tests and clinical evaluations. Various types of screening assays are available; it is imperative to understand their advantages and limitations to recognize their appropriateness and for an accurate interpretation of their results. Recent scientific advances are rapidly introducing new materials to endodontics including nanomaterials, gene therapy and tissue engineering biomaterials. These new modalities open a new era to restore and regenerate dental tissues; however, all these new technologies can also present new hazards to patients. Before any clinical usage, new materials must be proven to be safe and not hazardous to health. Certain international standards exist for safety evaluation of dental materials (ISO 10993 series, ISO 7405 and ISO 14155-1), but researchers often fail to follow these standards due to lack of access to standards, limitation of the guidelines and complexity of new experimental methods, which may cause technical errors. Moreover, many laboratories have developed their testing strategy for biocompatibility, which makes any comparison between findings more difficult. The purpose of this review was to discuss the concept of biocompatibility, structured test programmes and international standards for testing the biocompatibility of endodontic material biocompatibility. The text will further detail current test methods for evaluating the biocompatibility of endodontic materials, and their advantages and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.