Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35127347›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Utilization of healthcare and prescription medicines after non-pharmacological interventions for depression - A 3-year register follow-up of an RCT in primary care.

Elisabeth Bondesson, Anna Jöud, Kjerstin Stigmar, Åsa Ringqvist, Martin Kraepelien, Viktor Kaldo, Björn Wettermark, Yvonne Forsell, Ingemar F Petersson, Maria E C Schelin

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth BondessonLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Orthopaedics, Lund, Sweden.
Anna JöudLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Orthopaedics, Lund, Sweden.
Kjerstin StigmarLund University, Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Lund, Sweden.
Åsa RingqvistSkåne University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery and Pain Rehabilitation, Lund, Sweden.
Martin KraepelienCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor KaldoCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Björn WettermarkDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Yvonne ForsellKarolinska Institutet, Department of Global Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingemar F PeterssonLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Orthopaedics, Lund, Sweden.
Maria E C SchelinDepartment of Research and Education, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELinnaeus University · SEStockholm Health Care Services · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a common, recurrent disorder. There is a need for readily available treatments with few negative side effects, that demands little resources and that are effective both in the short- and long term. Our aim was to investigate the long-term effectiveness of two different interventions; physical exercise and internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (internet-CBT), compared to usual care in patients with mild to moderate depression in a Swedish primary care setting. We performed a register-based 3-year follow-up study of participants in the randomized controlled trial REGASSA (n = 940) using healthcare utilization and dispensed medicines as outcomes. We found no difference between the three groups regarding

Indexed as

AnxietyATC, Anatomical Therapeutic ChemicalDepressionElectronic health recordsHealthcare utilizationInternet-based treatmentInternet-CBT, Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapyLong-term follow-upPainPhysical exercisePrescription medicinesRCTRCT, Randomized control trialRR, Risk ratio

Identifiers

PMID35127347
PMCPMC8800057
OpenAlexW4200341178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.