ArticleCurrent protocols2022
Introducing Large Genomic Deletions in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Using CRISPR-Cas3.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visualizing the Nucleome Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System: From in vitro to in vivo.Biochemistry. Biokhimiia · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas systems provide researchers with eukaryotic genome editing tools and therapeutic platforms that make it possible to target disease mutations in somatic organs. Most of these tools employ Type II (e.g., Cas9) or Type V (e.g., Cas12a) CRISPR enzymes to create RNA-guided precise double-strand breaks in the genome. However, such technologies are limited in their capacity to make targeted large deletions. Recently, the Type I CRISPR system, which is prevalent in microbes and displays unique enzymatic features, has been harnessed to effectively create large chromosomal deletions in human cells. Type I CRISPR first uses a multisubunit ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex called Cascade to find its guide-complementary target site, and then recruits a helicase-nuclease enzyme, Cas3, to travel along and shred the target DNA over a long distance with high processivity. When introduced into human cells as purified RNPs, the CRISPR-Cas3 complex can efficiently induce large genomic deletions of varying lengths (1-100 kb) from the CRISPR-targeted site. Because of this unique editing outcome, CRISPR-Cas3 holds great promise for tasks such as the removal of integrated viral genomes and the interrogation of structural variants affecting gene function and human disease. Here, we provide detailed protocols for introducing large deletions using CRISPR-Cas3. We describe step-by-step procedures for purifying the Type I-E CRISPR proteins Cascade and Cas3 from Thermobifida fusca, electroporating RNPs into human cells, and characterizing DNA deletions using PCR and sequencing. We focus here on human pluripotent stem cells due to their clinical potential, but these protocols will be broadly useful for other cell lines and model organisms for applications including large genomic deletion, full-gene or -chromosome removal, and CRISPR screening for noncoding elements, among others. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Expression and purification of Tfu Cascade RNP Support Protocol 1: Expression and purification of TfuCas3 protein Support Protocol 2: Culture of human pluripotent stem cells Basic Protocol 2: Introduction of Tfu Cascade RNP and Cas3 protein into hPSCs via electroporation Basic Protocol 3: Characterization of genomic DNA lesions using long-range PCR, TOPO cloning, and Sanger sequencing Alternate Protocol: Comprehensive analysis of genomic lesions by Tn5-based next-generation sequencing Support Protocol 3: Single-cell clonal isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.