Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35130693›Full record

ReviewChemical research in toxicology2022

What to Expect When Expecting in Lab: A Review of Unique Risks and Resources for Pregnant Researchers in the Chemical Laboratory.

Mary Kate M Lane, Mahlet Garedew, Emma C Deary, Cherish N Coleman, Melissa M Ahrens-Víquez, Hanno C Erythropel, Julie B Zimmerman, Paul T Anastas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Kate M LaneDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Mahlet GaredewCenter for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Emma C DearyDepartment of Anthropology, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481, United States.
Cherish N ColemanDepartment of Biology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan 48221, United States.
Melissa M Ahrens-VíquezDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
Hanno C ErythropelDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-9794
Julie B ZimmermanDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5392-312X
Paul T AnastasCenter for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4777-5172
Yale University · USUniversity of Detroit Mercy · USWellesley College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy presents a unique risk to chemical researchers due to their occupational exposures to chemical, equipment, and physical hazards in chemical research laboratories across science, engineering, and technology disciplines. Understanding "risk" as a function of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, this review aims to critically examine the state of the science for the risks and associated recommendations (or lack thereof) for pregnant researchers in chemical laboratories (labs). Commonly encountered hazards for pregnant lab workers include chemical hazards (organic solvents, heavy metals, engineered nanomaterials, and endocrine disruptors), radiation hazards (ionizing radiation producing equipment and materials and nonionizing radiation producing equipment), and other hazards related to the lab environment (excessive noise, excessive heat, psychosocial stress, strenuous physical work, and/or abnormal working hours). Lab relevant doses and routes of exposure in the chemical lab environment along with literature and governmental recommendations or resources for exposure mitigation are critically assessed. The specific windows of vulnerability based on stage of pregnancy are described for each hazard, if available. Finally, policy gaps for further scientific research are detailed to enhance future guidance to protect pregnant lab workers.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesRadiation, IonizingFemaleHazardous SubstancesHumansOccupational ExposurePregnancyResearch PersonnelHazardous Substances

Identifiers

PMID35130693
PMCPMC8864617
OpenAlexW4210906872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.