ArticleBMC cancer2022
The short-term and oncologic outcomes of younger VS older colorectal cancer patients undergoing primary surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients with colorectal cancer combined with HIV had a worse overall survival after surgery: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in early- versus late-onset colorectal cancer: a stage-stratified retrospective surgical cohort from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of stent placement on short term survival of left sided obstructive colorectal cancer: comparison of bridge-to-surgery versus emergency surgery approaches.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- OncoE25: an AI model for predicting postoperative prognosis in early-onset stage I-III colon and rectal cancer-a population-based study using SEER with dual-center cohort validation.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of sporadic, IBD-associated, early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- A decade-long study on pathological distinctions of resectable early versus late onset colorectal cancer and optimal screening age determination.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lymph node dissection does not affect the survival of patients with tumor node metastasis stages I and II colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Younger patients with colorectal cancer may have better long-term survival after surgery: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Does chronic kidney disease affect the short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer surgery? A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Effects of preoperative bicarbonate and lactate levels on short-term outcomes and prognosis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- The effect of carbon nanoparticles staining on lymph node tracking in colorectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Does Hyponatremia Affect the Short-Term Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Effect of hypoalbuminemia on short-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Comparison of Postoperative Outcome and Prognosis Among Laparoscopic Left Colectomy and Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy in Sigmoid Colon Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the current study is to analyze the difference of short-term and oncologic outcomes between younger and older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent primary CRC surgery using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
methodsWe retrospectively collected CRC patients who underwent primary surgery in a single clinical database from Jan 2011 to Jan 2020. The short-term and oncologic outcomes were compared between younger aged group and older aged group.
resultsA total of 4599 patients were included in this study, and there were 4196 patients in older aged group and 403 patients in younger aged group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 401 patients in each group. No significant difference was found in terms of baseline information after PSM (p>0.05). Younger aged group had larger retrieved lymph nodes before (p<0.001) and after PSM (p=0.001) than older aged group. In multivariate analysis, younger age was an independent predictor of better overall survival (OS) (p<0.001, HR=2.303, 95% CI=1.658-3.199) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.008, HR=1.425, 95% CI=1.098-1.850). In terms of different tumor stage after PSM, younger aged group had better OS than older group in stage II (p<0.001) and stage IV (p=0.028) CRC, and younger aged group had better DFS than older group in stage II (p=0.016) CRC.
conclusionYounger CRC patients had larger retrieved lymph nodes and better prognosis than older CRC patients after primary CRC surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.