ArticleGigaScience2022
Interpretable network-guided epistasis detection.
Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- From family trials to genomic mate allocation: statistical and genomic strategies to accelerate sugarcane genetic improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- A prototype-augmented graph representation learning framework for identifying brain disorder-associated genes and facilitating drug repurposing.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Turning heterogeneity of statistical epistasis networks to an advantage.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Detecting genetic interactions with visible neural networks.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Network medicine-based epistasis detection in complex diseases: ready for quantum computing.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Network propagation for GWAS analysis: a practical guide to leveraging molecular networks for disease gene discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Network medicine-based epistasis detection in complex diseases: ready for quantum computing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Edge and modular significance assessment in individual-specific networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- netANOVA: novel graph clustering technique with significance assessment via hierarchical ANOVA.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Interpretable network-guided epistasis detection.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Detecting gene-gene interactions from GWAS using diffusion kernel principal components.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetecting epistatic interactions at the gene level is essential to understanding the biological mechanisms of complex diseases. Unfortunately, genome-wide interaction association studies involve many statistical challenges that make such detection hard. We propose a multi-step protocol for epistasis detection along the edges of a gene-gene co-function network. Such an approach reduces the number of tests performed and provides interpretable interactions while keeping type I error controlled. Yet, mapping gene interactions into testable single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-interaction hypotheses, as well as computing gene pair association scores from SNP pair ones, is not trivial.
resultsHere we compare 3 SNP-gene mappings (positional overlap, expression quantitative trait loci, and proximity in 3D structure) and use the adaptive truncated product method to compute gene pair scores. This method is non-parametric, does not require a known null distribution, and is fast to compute. We apply multiple variants of this protocol to a genome-wide association study dataset on inflammatory bowel disease. Different configurations produced different results, highlighting that various mechanisms are implicated in inflammatory bowel disease, while at the same time, results overlapped with known disease characteristics. Importantly, the proposed pipeline also differs from a conventional approach where no network is used, showing the potential for additional discoveries when prior biological knowledge is incorporated into epistasis detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.