ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022
Novel patterns of expression and recruitment of new genes on the
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Acquisition of ampliconic sequences marks a selfish mouse t-haplotype.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Single-cell consequences of X-linked meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Natural variation in the zinc-finger-encoding exon of Prdm9 affects hybrid sterility phenotypes in mice.Genetics · 2024Article
- New perspectives on the causes and consequences of male meiotic drive.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023Review
- Leveraging a natural murine meiotic drive to suppress invasive populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Supergene potential of a selfish centromere.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.