Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35142336›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2022

The Nasonia pair-rule gene regulatory network retains its function over 300 million years of evolution.

Shannon E Taylor, Peter K Dearden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why just fly?Fly · 2025
    Review
  2. Embryogenesis in Myrmicine Ants Combines Features of Short Germ-Band Development With a Progressive Mode of Segmentation.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The development and evolution of arthropod tagmata.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Same rule, different genes:Science advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shannon E TaylorGenomics Aotearoa and Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, Aotearoa-New Zealand.
Peter K DeardenGenomics Aotearoa and Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, Aotearoa-New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7790-9675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect segmentation is a well-studied and tractable system with which to investigate the genetic regulation of development. Though insects segment their germband using a variety of methods, modelling work implies that a single gene regulatory network can underpin the two main types of insect segmentation. This means limited genetic changes are required to explain significant differences in segmentation mode between different insects. This idea needs to be tested in a wider variety of species, and the nature of the gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying this model has not been tested. Some insects, e.g. Nasonia vitripennis and Apis mellifera segment progressively, a pattern not examined in previous studies of this segmentation model, producing stripes at different times progressively through the embryo, but not from a segment addition zone. Here, we aim to understand the GRNs patterning Nasonia using a simulation-based approach. We found that an existing model of Drosophila segmentation ( Clark, 2017) can be used to recapitulate the progressive segmentation of Nasonia, if provided with altered inputs in the form of expression of the timer genes Nv-caudal and Nv-odd paired. We predict limited topological changes to the pair-rule network and show, by RNAi knockdown, that Nv-odd paired is required for morphological segmentation. Together this implies that very limited changes to the Drosophila network are required to simulate Nasonia segmentation, despite significant differences in segmentation modes, implying that Nasonia use a very similar version of an ancestral GRN used by Drosophila, which must therefore have been conserved for at least 300 million years.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBeesDrosophilaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalInsectaInsect ProteinsInsect ProteinsGene regulatory networkNasoniaPair-rule genesPatterningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35142336
PMCPMC8959145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.