Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145236›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2022

The use of new CRISPR tools in cardiovascular research and medicine.

Masataka Nishiga, Chun Liu, Lei S Qi, Joseph C Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Precision modification of heart failure signaling by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. mRNA medicine for cardiovascular disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. BES-Designer: A Web Tool to Design Guide RNAs for Base Editing to Simplify Library.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masataka NishigaStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. mnishiga@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-7671
Chun LiuStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lei S QiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-3223
Joseph C WuStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. joewu@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6068-8041

Funding

Human iPSCs for Elucidating Intercellular Crosstalk Signaling in Dilated CardiomyopathyR01HL141371 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, WING H., WU, JOSEPH C. · 2018 to 2025
$6.2M
Modeling Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Vascular Dysfunction Using Human iPSCsR01HL141851 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, WING H., WU, JOSEPH C. · 2018 to 2025
$5.7M
Engineering and Imaging 3D genome structure-function dynamics across time scalesU01DK127405 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, PHILLIPS-CREMINS, JENNIFER ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2024
$5.7M
Genome Editing of Human iPSCs to Study Inherited Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyR01HL126527 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QI, LEI STANLEY, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2015 to 2022
$5.4M
Single Cell Sequencing of Human iPSC-CM Subtype Identity and FunctionR01HL145676 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARK MERCOLA, Joseph C. Wu · 2019 to 2026
$5.1M
Modeling Susceptibility to Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity Using Human iPSCsR01HL123968 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QUERTERMOUS, THOMAS, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2014 to 2021
$4.8M
Elucidating Anthracycline-Induced Cell Type-Specific Cardiovascular Toxicity with CRISPRi/a ScreensR01HL150693 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ronglih Liao, Joseph C. Wu · 2021 to 2026
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123968NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126527NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141371NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141851NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL145676NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150693NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many novel CRISPR-based genome-editing tools, with a wide variety of applications, have been developed in the past few years. The original CRISPR-Cas9 system was developed as a tool to alter genomic sequences in living organisms in a simple way. However, the functions of new CRISPR tools are not limited to conventional genome editing mediated by non-homologous end-joining or homology-directed repair but expand into gene-expression control, epigenome editing, single-nucleotide editing, RNA editing and live-cell imaging. Furthermore, genetic perturbation screening by multiplexing guide RNAs is gaining popularity as a method to identify causative genes and pathways in an unbiased manner. New CRISPR tools can also be applied to ex vivo or in vivo therapeutic genome editing for the treatment of conditions such as hyperlipidaemia. In this Review, we first provide an overview of the diverse new CRISPR tools that have been developed to date. Second, we summarize how these new CRISPR tools are being used to study biological processes and disease mechanisms in cardiovascular research and medicine. Finally, we discuss the prospect of therapeutic genome editing by CRISPR tools to cure genetic cardiovascular diseases.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID35145236
PMCPMC10283450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.