Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147166›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2022

Cardiomyocyte BRAF and type 1 RAF inhibitors promote cardiomyocyte and cardiac hypertrophy in mice in vivo.

Angela Clerk, Daniel N Meijles, Michelle A Hardyman, Stephen J Fuller, Sonia P Chothani, Joshua J Cull, Susanna T E Cooper, Hajed O Alharbi, Konstantinos Vanezis, Leanne E Felkin and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Angela ClerkSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5658-0708
Daniel N MeijlesMolecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George's University of London, London, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-3549
Michelle A HardymanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Stephen J FullerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Sonia P ChothaniProgram in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore.
Joshua J CullSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Susanna T E CooperMolecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George's University of London, London, U.K.
Hajed O AlharbiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Konstantinos VanezisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K.
Leanne E FelkinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K.
Thomais MarkouSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Samuel J LeonardSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Spencer W ShawSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Owen J L RackhamProgram in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore.
Stuart A CookProgram in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore City, Singapore.
Peter E GlennonUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, University Hospital Cardiology Department, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, U.K.
Mary N SheppardCRY Cardiovascular Pathology Department, St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
John C SembratDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, and Dorothy P & Richard P Simmons Center for Interstitial Lung Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Mauricio RojasDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, and Dorothy P & Richard P Simmons Center for Interstitial Lung Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Charles F McTiernanHeart, Lung, Blood Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Paul J BartonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, U.K.
Peter H SugdenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
University of Reading · GBNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Pittsburgh · USHarefield Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/18/33/3362British Heart Foundation FS/18/33/33621British Heart Foundation FS/19/24/34262British Heart Foundation PG/13/71/30460British Heart Foundation PG/15/24/31367British Heart Foundation PG/15/31/31393British Heart Foundation PG/17/11/32841British Heart Foundation PG/19/32/34383British Heart Foundation PG/19/7/34167British Heart Foundation SP/19/1/34461Medical Research Council MC_U120085815Wellcome Trust 204809/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) cascade promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and is cardioprotective, with the three RAF kinases forming a node for signal integration. Our aims were to determine if BRAF is relevant for human heart failure, whether BRAF promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and if Type 1 RAF inhibitors developed for cancer (that paradoxically activate ERK1/2 at low concentrations: the 'RAF paradox') may have the same effect. BRAF was up-regulated in heart samples from patients with heart failure compared with normal controls. We assessed the effects of activated BRAF in the heart using mice with tamoxifen-activated Cre for cardiomyocyte-specific knock-in of the activating V600E mutation into the endogenous gene. We used echocardiography to measure cardiac dimensions/function. Cardiomyocyte BRAFV600E induced cardiac hypertrophy within 10 d, resulting in increased ejection fraction and fractional shortening over 6 weeks. This was associated with increased cardiomyocyte size without significant fibrosis, consistent with compensated hypertrophy. The experimental Type 1 RAF inhibitor, SB590885, and/or encorafenib (a RAF inhibitor used clinically) increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes, and promoted hypertrophy, consistent with a 'RAF paradox' effect. Both promoted cardiac hypertrophy in mouse hearts in vivo, with increased cardiomyocyte size and no overt fibrosis. In conclusion, BRAF potentially plays an important role in human failing hearts, activation of BRAF is sufficient to induce hypertrophy, and Type 1 RAF inhibitors promote hypertrophy via the 'RAF paradox'. Cardiac hypertrophy resulting from these interventions was not associated with pathological features, suggesting that Type 1 RAF inhibitors may be useful to boost cardiomyocyte function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbamatesCardiomegalyCells, CulturedCell SizeDimerizationGene Knock-In TechniquesHeart FailureHumansMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutation, MissenseMyocytes, CardiacPoint MutationBRAF protein, humanBraf protein, mouseBraf protein, ratCarbamatesencorafenibProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafRaf1 protein, humanRaf1 protein, mouseSulfonamidesBRAFcardiac hypertrophycardiomyocytesinhibitorsprotein kinases

Identifiers

PMID35147166
PMCPMC8883496
OpenAlexW4220911578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.