Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147724›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2022

L-DOPA administration shifts the stability-flexibility balance towards attentional capture by distractors during a visual search task.

P Riedel, I M Domachowska, Y Lee, P T Neukam, L Tönges, S C Li, T Goschke, M N Smolka

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P RiedelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
I M DomachowskaDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Y LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
P T NeukamDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
L TöngesDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
S C LiDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
T Goschke *Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
M N Smolka *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. michael.smolka@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-5569
Technische Universität Dresden · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 178833530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe cognitive control dilemma describes the necessity to balance two antagonistic modes of attention: stability and flexibility. Stability refers to goal-directed thought, feeling, or action and flexibility refers to the complementary ability to adapt to an ever-changing environment. Their balance is thought to be maintained by neurotransmitters such as dopamine, most likely in a U-shaped rather than linear manner. However, in humans, studies on the stability-flexibility balance using a dopaminergic agent and/or measurement of brain dopamine are scarce.

objectiveThe study aimed to investigate the causal involvement of dopamine in the stability-flexibility balance and the nature of this relationship in humans.

methodsDistractibility was assessed as the difference in reaction time (RT) between distractor and non-distractor trials in a visual search task. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, 65 healthy participants performed the task under placebo and a dopamine precursor (L-DOPA). Using

resultsThere was a pronounced RT distractor effect in the placebo session that increased under L-DOPA. Neither the RT distractor effect in the placebo session nor the magnitude of its L-DOPA-induced increase were related to baseline striatal dopamine.

conclusionsL-DOPA administration shifted the stability-flexibility balance towards attentional capture by distractors, suggesting causal involvement of dopamine. This finding is consistent with current theories of prefrontal cortex dopamine function. Current data can neither confirm nor falsify the inverted U-shaped function hypothesis with regard to cognitive control.

Indexed as

AttentionLevodopaCross-Over StudiesDopamineHumansReaction TimeDopamineLevodopaAttentional breadthAttentional captureCognitive controlDopamineStability-flexibility balance

Identifiers

PMID35147724
PMCPMC8891202
OpenAlexW4211038540

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.