Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35151312›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2022

Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.

Leila Doshmangir, Hakimeh Mostafavi, Masoud Behzadifar, Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Haniye Sadat Sajadi, Edris Hasanpoor, Mahdi Mahdavi, Reza Majdzadeh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leila DoshmangirDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hakimeh MostafaviHealth Equity Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoud BehzadifarSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Bahareh YazdizadehKnowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Haniye Sadat SajadiKnowledge Utilization Research Center, University Research & Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Edris HasanpoorResearch Center for Evidence-Based Health Management, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran.
Mahdi MahdaviNational Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza MajdzadehKnowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rezamajd@tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-5261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding valid evidence to policy-makers is a key factor in the development of evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM). This study aims to review interventions used to promote researchers' and knowledge-producing organizations' knowledge and skills in the production and translation of evidence to policy-making and explore the interventions at the individual and institutional level in the Iranian health system to strengthen EIPM.

methodsThe study was conducted in two main phases: a systematic review and a qualitative study. First, to conduct the systematic review, the PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Quality appraisal was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Second, semi-structured interviews and document review were used to collect local data. Purposive sampling was used and continued until data saturation. A qualitative content analysis approach was used for data analysis.

resultsFrom a total of 11,514 retrieved articles, 18 papers were eligible for the analysis. Based on the global evidence, face-to-face training workshops for researchers was the most widely used intervention for strengthening researchers' capacity regarding EIPM. Target audiences in almost all of the training programmes were researchers. Setting up joint training sessions that helped empower researchers in understanding the needs of health policy-makers had a considerable effect on strengthening EIPM. Based on the local collected evidence, the main interventions for individual and institutional capacity-building were educational and training programmes or courses related to the health system, policy-making and policy analysis, and research cycle management. To implement the individual and institutional interventions, health system planners and authorities and the community were found to have a key role as facilitating factors.

conclusionThe use of evidence-based interventions for strengthening research centres, such as training health researchers on knowledge translation and tackling institutional barriers that can prevent well-trained researchers from translating their knowledge, as well as the use of mechanisms and networks for effective interactions among policy-makers at the macro and meso (organizational) level and the research centre, will be constructive for individual and institutional capacity-building. The health system needs to strengthen its strategic capacity to facilitate an educational and training culture in order to motivate researchers in producing appropriate evidence for policy-makers.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingPolicy MakingAdministrative PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansIranEvidenceHealth policyHealth system researchPolicy interventions

Identifiers

PMID35151312
PMCPMC8841080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.