Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35152903›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022

Antibiofilm and anticancer activities of unripe and ripe Azadirachta indica (neem) seed extracts.

Kartik Chandra Guchhait, Tuhin Manna, Manas Barai, Monalisha Karmakar, Sourav Kumar Nandi, Debarati Jana, Aditi Dey, Suman Panda, Priyanka Raul, Anuttam Patra and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Unveiling the Neem (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. The Antimicrobial Potential of the Neem TreeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kartik Chandra GuchhaitDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Tuhin MannaDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Manas BaraiDepartment of Chemistry, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Monalisha KarmakarDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Sourav Kumar NandiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 3081 Nayabad, Kolkata, 700094, West Bengal, India.
Debarati JanaDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Aditi DeyDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Suman PandaDepartment of Biophysics, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Road, Scheme VIIM, Kankurgachi, Kolkata, 700054, West Bengal, India.
Priyanka RaulDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Anuttam PatraChemistry of Interfaces Group, Luleå University of Technology, SE- 97187, Luleå, Sweden.
Rittwika BhattacharyaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 3081 Nayabad, Kolkata, 700094, West Bengal, India.
Subhrangsu ChatterjeeDepartment of Biophysics, Bose Institute, P-1/12 CIT Road, Scheme VIIM, Kankurgachi, Kolkata, 700054, West Bengal, India.
Amiya Kumar PandaDepartment of Chemistry, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India.
Chandradipa GhoshDepartment of Human Physiology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, 721102, West Bengal, India. ch_ghosh@mail.vidyasagar.ac.in.
Vidyasagar University · INBose Institute · INNetaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute · INLuleå University of Technology · SE

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India Project Number BT/PR3802/BRB/10/981/2011University Grant Commission, INDIA MAY2018-350312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistances of pathogens and breast cancer warrant the search for new alternative strategies. Phytoextracts can eradicate microbe-borne diseases as well as cancer with lower side effects compared to conventional antibiotics.

aimUnripe and ripe Azadirachta indica (neem) seed extracts were explored as potential antibiofilm and anticancer agents in combating multidrug-resistant infectious bacteria as well as anticancer agents against the MDR breast cancer cell lines.

methodsShed-dried neem seeds (both unripe and ripe) were pulverized and extracted using methanol. The chemical components were identified with FTIR and gas chromatography - mass spectrometry. Antibiofilm activity of neem seed extracts were assessed in terms of minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC), minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), and fluorescence microscopic studies on Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio cholerae. Bacterial cells were studied by fluorescence microscopy using acridine orange/ethidium bromide as the staining agents. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were evaluated to observe the antibacterial activities. Cytotoxicity of the extracts against human blood lymphocytes and the anticancer activity against drug-resistant breast cancer cell lines were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) studies.

results4-Ethyl-2-hydroxy-2-cyclopentene-1-one, phthalic acid, and 2-hexyl-tetrahydro thiophane were the major compounds in unripe neem seed, whereas 3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4-H-pyran-4-one and 4-ethylbenzamide were predominant in ripe neem seed. Triazine derivatives were also common for both the extracts. MBIC values of unripe and ripe neem seed extracts for S. aureus are 75 and 100 µg/mL, respectively, and for V. cholerae, they are 100 and 300 µg/mL, respectively. MBEC values of unripe and ripe seed extracts are 500 and 300 µg/mL, respectively for S. aureus and for V. cholerae the values are 700 and 500 µg/mL, respectively. Fluorescence microscopic studies at 16 and 24 h, after bacterial culture, demonstrate enhanced antibiofilm activity for the ripe seed extract than that of the unripe seeds for both the bacteria. MTT assay reveals lower cytotoxicity of both the extracts towards normal blood lymphocytes, and anticancer activity against breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) with superior activity of ripe seed extract. FACS studies further supported higher anticancer activity for ripe seed extract.

conclusionsMethanolic extract of neem seeds could substantially inhibit and eradicate biofilm along with their potent antibacterial and anticancer activities. Both the extracts showed higher antibiofilm and antibacterial activity against S. aureus (gram-positive) than V. cholerae (gram-negative). Moreover, ripe seed extract showed higher antibiofilm and anticancer activity than unripe extracts.

Indexed as

AzadirachtaBiofilmsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsStaphylococcus aureusPlant ExtractsAzadirachta indicaBacteriaBiofilmCancerNeemS. aureusV. cholerae

Identifiers

PMID35152903
PMCPMC8843028
OpenAlexW4212791459

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.