Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35153521›Full record

ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2022

A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Aditi Shankar, Gayathri Gurumurthy, Lakshmi Sridharan, Divya Gupta, William J Nicholson, Wissam A Jaber, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Management, Outcomes and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock.European journal of heart failure · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aditi ShankarDepartment of Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Gayathri GurumurthyJiva Health, Concord, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2481-7149
Lakshmi SridharanSection of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-4892
Divya GuptaSection of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William J NicholsonSection of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Wissam A JaberSection of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Saraschandra VallabhajosyulaSection of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1631-8238
Emory University · USTexas Health Dallas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a focused review looking at the pharmacological support in cardiogenic shock. There are a plethora of data evaluating vasopressors and inotropes in septic shock, but the data are limited for cardiogenic shock. This review article describes in detail the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock, the mechanism of action of different vasopressors and inotropes emphasizing their indications and potential side effects. This review article incorporates the currently used specific risk-prediction models in cardiogenic shock as well as integrates data from many trials on the use of vasopressors and inotropes. Lastly, this review seeks to discuss the future direction for vasoactive medications in cardiogenic shock.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockinotropesmechanical circulatory supportvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID35153521
PMCPMC8829716
OpenAlexW4210824246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.