Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35154679›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2022

LC-ESI-QTOF/MS characterization of antimicrobial compounds with their action mode extracted from vine tea (

Muhammad Umair, Tayyaba Sultana, Zhu Xiaoyu, Ahmed M Senan, Saqib Jabbar, Labiba Khan, Muhammad Abid, Mian Anjum Murtaza, Dhama Kuldeep, Niyazi A S Al-Areqi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review of the Composition and Antimicrobial Roles of Extracts of Vine Tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata).Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Novel methods to monitor the biodegradation of polylactic acid (PLA) byFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. China Medicinal Plants of theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad UmairCollege of Food Science and Technology Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2035-686X
Tayyaba SultanaCollege of Public Administration Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.
Zhu XiaoyuCollege of Food Science and Technology Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.
Ahmed M SenanCollege of Food Science and Technology Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.
Saqib JabbarFood Science Research Institute (FSRI) National Agricultural Research Centre Islamabad Pakistan.
Labiba KhanFood Science Research Institute (FSRI) National Agricultural Research Centre Islamabad Pakistan.
Muhammad AbidInstitute of Food and Nutritional Sciences Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi Rawalpindi Pakistan.
Mian Anjum MurtazaInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition University of Sargodha Sargodha Pakistan.
Dhama KuldeepDivision of Pathology ICAR-Indian Veterinary, Research Institute Izatnagar India.
Niyazi A S Al-AreqiDepartment of Chemistry Faculty of Applied Science Taiz University Taiz Republic of Yemen.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0269-4619
Lu ZhaoxinCollege of Food Science and Technology Nanjing Agriculture University Nanjing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vine tea (

Indexed as

5,7,8,3,4‐pentahydroxyisoflavoneaction modeantimicrobial activitybactericidal kineticsLC‐ESI‐QTOF/MSvine tea

Identifiers

PMID35154679
PMCPMC8825723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.