Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35158787›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Second Cancers in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.

Luca Nassi, Vitaliana De Sanctis, Giacomo Loseto, Chiara Gerardi, Eleonora Allocati, Sabino Ciavarella, Carla Minoia, Attilio Guarini, Alessia Bari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luca NassiDepartment of Hematology, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Vitaliana De SanctisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giacomo LosetoHematology Unit-IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Chiara GerardiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Eleonora AllocatiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Sabino CiavarellaHematology Unit-IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Carla MinoiaHematology Unit-IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-0689
Attilio GuariniHematology Unit-IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Alessia BariDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno-Infantili e dell'Adulto, Universita' di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9538-2499
Istituto Tumori Bari · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

Ministry of Health, Italy del.153/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase of lymphoma patient survival led to a modification of the incidence of long-term sequelae, including second malignancies (SM). Several groups have dealt with the incidence of SM, according to the primary treatment; however, a standardized approach for the early detection and screening of SM in the population of lymphoma survivors should be implemented.

methodsA systematic review was conducted by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL), in order to define the incidence of SM, the impact of modern radiotherapy on SM risk, and the usefulness of tailored follow-up and screening strategies for early diagnosis of SM. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors were investigated. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were checked for relevant reports published up to January 2020. The selection process was reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

resultsA total of 27 full-text manuscripts resulted as eligible for the analysis. The incidence of SM in cHL patients treated with ABVD was higher compared to the general population and was even higher in patients treated with intensified regimens. The risk increased over time, as well as after 10-15 years from therapy, and was augmented by radiotherapy exposure. In DLBCL, more intensive regimens (i.e., R-CHOEP or R-MegaCHOEP) vs. R-CHOP were associated with a higher SM incidence. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplants increased the risk of SM in both cHL and DLBCL cohorts. A lower incidence of SM, particularly of breast cancer (BC), was shown in cohorts of cHL survivors treated with reduced radiation volumes and doses (involved fields vs. extended fields), but robust trials are still lacking. Considering the advantage of a structured screening for early detection of SM, all the included studies regarded cHL survivors and screening strategy for early BC detection. Moreover, the authors discuss additional papers, to guide the early diagnosis of lung, colorectal, skin, and thyroid cancer in patients at risk due to family history, drug or RT exposure, or unhealthy lifestyles. These screening strategies all passed through patient awareness.

conclusionA modern approach to chemotherapy and radiotherapy led to a lower risk of SM, which should be confirmed over time. Early detection of secondary cancers could be achieved through a tailored screening program, according to the individual risk profile.

Indexed as

classical Hodgkin lymphomadiffuse large B-cell lymphomaearly diagnosisincidencescreeningsecond malignancies/cancerssurvivorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35158787
PMCPMC8833346
OpenAlexW4205958101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.