Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159111›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Dose-Intense Cisplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Increases Survival in Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.

Van Tai Nguyen, Sabine Winterman, Margot Playe, Amélie Benbara, Laurent Zelek, Frédéric Pamoukdjian, Guilhem Bousquet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Promising predictive molecular biomarkers for cervical cancer (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Van Tai NguyenNational Cancer Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology 1, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-1363-8161
Sabine WintermanAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, 93000 Bobigny, France.
Margot PlayeAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, 93000 Bobigny, France.
Amélie BenbaraAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, 93140 Bondy, France.
Laurent ZelekAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, 93000 Bobigny, France.
Frédéric PamoukdjianInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR_S942, Université de Paris-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93000 Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-9857
Guilhem BousquetAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, 93000 Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5594-6694
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe set out to demonstrate the benefit of using dose-intense cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.

methodsWe searched through MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2021 to identify randomized clinical trials comparing the benefit of using cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local treatment with local treatment alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The PRISMA statement was applied.

resultsTwenty-two randomized clinical trials were retrieved between 1991 and 2019, corresponding to 3632 women with FIGO stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. More than 50% of the randomized clinical trials were assessed as having a low risk of bias. There was no benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival, but there was significant heterogeneity across studies (I

conclusionEven though radiotherapy combined with weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, our meta-analysis makes it possible to consider the use of dose-intense cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy when local treatment is suboptimal and opens perspectives for designing new clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be proposed when surgery is local treatment instead of standard chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Indexed as

dose-intense cisplatin-basedlocally advanced cervical cancerneoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID35159111
PMCPMC8834199
OpenAlexW4211243897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.